Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-03-2002, 06:10 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 1162 easy freeway minutes from the new ICR in TX
Posts: 896
|
>ISCID
>66 Witherspoon Street, Suite 1800 >Princeton, NJ 08542 It was simply an honest mistake -- they mis-spelled "P.O. Box". It's a goof that anyone could make! BTW, folks can verify that ISCID's location is a Mailboxes Etc. office by going to Mailboxes Etc's web-site at <a href="http://www.mbe.com" target="_blank">www.mbe.com</a> [ January 03, 2002: Message edited by: S2Focus ]</p> |
01-03-2002, 07:25 PM | #12 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Columbia, Maryland, USA
Posts: 120
|
Quote:
|
|
01-04-2002, 05:50 PM | #13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: La Jolla, CA
Posts: 72
|
this topic is so hot on ARN that it spawned a second thread:
<a href="http://www.arn.org/ubb/Forum1/HTML/001544.html" target="_blank">ISCID, Mailboxes Etc. and P.O. Boxes</a> this kind of reminds me of the bush/gore election when a bush commercial had the word "RATS" flash subliminally in the background when they were describing gore's tactics, then denied that it was intentional. |
01-04-2002, 06:26 PM | #14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 9,747
|
Yeah, I read that thread, and it really has gotten rather ridiculous. The only thing funnier than the ISCID "suite" is how the IDers there are getting so angry about it. Why can't they just laugh like everyone else and get over it? It's not that big a deal, but of course everything's a big deal with IDers. It's that kind of thing that makes me have to take a dramamine before lurking over there.
Regardless of their intentions, I for one was led to believe that ISCID had a physical Princeton location, and they certainly did nothing to caution against that image. Which of course is precisely why I found the photo to be so funny. I don't know why the IDers can't get that through their heads. theyeti |
01-04-2002, 07:41 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 762
|
Quote:
Because they are embarassed at getting found out. |
|
01-04-2002, 10:58 PM | #16 |
Moderator - Science Discussions
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Providence, RI, USA
Posts: 9,908
|
In fairness, it should be pointed out that that branch of Mailboxes etc. actually suggests that customers list the address as "Suite" (although this is in violation of postal codes, apparently). OTOH, the "Princeton Office" heading on the list of phone extensions does make it sound like a real office...I'm undecided on whether they were trying to create a false impression or not. Anyway, it's not really important either way, but the picture is pretty funny.
|
01-05-2002, 07:51 AM | #17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
|
The discussion about the organization's address is causing quite a tempest over at ARN:
<a href="http://www.arn.org/ubb/Forum1/HTML/001544.html" target="_blank">http://www.arn.org/ubb/Forum1/HTML/001544.html</a> |
01-06-2002, 07:24 AM | #18 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX, US
Posts: 244
|
Is Dembski branching out?
<a href="http://www.tapdance.com/contact.htm" target="_blank">TapDance Skills Assessments</a> The above was discovered by John Stear of No Answers in Genesis. [ January 06, 2002: Message edited by: gallo ]</p> |
01-06-2002, 07:42 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 762
|
Quote:
|
|
01-06-2002, 07:54 AM | #20 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,898
|
And I found <a href="http://web.starlinx.com/inform-systems/isc.htm" target="_blank">this one</a>. Not so much fun, but it does make one wonder how the hell they all fit into that little box.
Martin |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|