Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
07-12-2002, 08:21 AM | #11 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fort Collins, CO, USA
Posts: 104
|
Speaking of the Star Spangled Banner, here's where the melody came from:
<a href="http://www.bcpl.net/~etowner/anacreon.html" target="_blank">Anacreon</a> Dan |
07-12-2002, 09:21 AM | #12 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: North Augusta, SC; Aiken-Augusta metro area
Posts: 283
|
LOL! It was based on a drinking song! I've gotta tell people this one.
|
07-12-2002, 12:38 PM | #13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Alaska, USA
Posts: 1,535
|
Quote:
As I see it, if individuals are invited to interpret "God" or any of the other words in the Pledge any way they choose, it defeats the purpose of having everyone commit themselves to the same national ideals. A Pledge cannot unify a nation if every citizen has a different view of what it means. Thus, I would extend your statement, nogods4me, to say that the one-and-only Pledge must have one-and-only meaning. Thus, "God" means God (or as Eisenhower put it, "the Almighty") and is unquestionably an endorsement of monotheism. P.S. The "money = God" guy also fondly recalls saying the pledge in 1942 while saluting the flag with an outstretched hand. Even at the time this was decried as Nazi-like, and was soon abandoned and forgotten. [ July 12, 2002: Message edited by: Grumpy ]</p> |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|