Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-20-2002, 03:02 PM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: A city in Florida that I love
Posts: 3,416
|
Yes; for example, I could claim that since Jupiter is traditionally depicted with a beard, therefore I must have one too. It's something to think about.
|
08-20-2002, 03:15 PM | #12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 3,568
|
Another Jesus question, maybe a stupid one... was the actual Jesus supposedly named "Jesus Christ" (i.e. first name = Jesus, last name = Christ)? Or was he just "Jesus", and the "Christ" part came later, as some religiously-significant word?
|
08-20-2002, 03:42 PM | #13 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
|
CX, I must respectfully disagree. In John Jesus reaches up and yanks one of the disciple's beards, suggesting that he was short, and in Luke there is an ambiguous passage that suggests Jesus was short as well. Of course, that's not much of a physical description.
Vorkosigan |
08-20-2002, 03:50 PM | #14 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Isn't it properly "Jesus, the Christ," with "the" being dropped for convenience?
|
08-20-2002, 08:54 PM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southwest USA
Posts: 4,093
|
I always thought his name was Jesus H. Christ.
I think, though that since he was a Jew, his name was probably Yeshua ben Yoseph. [ August 21, 2002: Message edited by: Tristan Scott ]</p> |
08-21-2002, 05:42 AM | #16 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
|
Quote:
|
|
08-21-2002, 05:51 AM | #17 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
|
Quote:
As someone else has already pointed out his last name would have reflected his ancestry from Joseph (as we find for example with his disciple John son of Zebedee). Furthermore, though his name is translated as Jesus in English versions, his name was Joshua. Elsewhere in the NT when the English version speaks of Joshua (here distinguished from Jesus), the same Greek transliteration is found, namely IHSOUS. So we can conclude that his name transliterated into English today would be Joshua Ben Yosef. A truer version might be Yeshu'a Ben Yosef. This naming convention is still used by Jews and Arabs (with the Arabic being Bin instead of Ben). A totally Anglicized version would be be Joshua Josephson. [ August 21, 2002: Message edited by: CX ]</p> |
|
08-21-2002, 05:58 AM | #18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portlandish
Posts: 2,829
|
Quote:
|
|
08-23-2002, 09:15 PM | #19 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: hell if I know
Posts: 2,306
|
Quote:
|
|
08-30-2002, 04:22 AM | #20 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hell, New York
Posts: 151
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|