FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-13-2003, 07:13 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,335
Default Re: November post

Quote:
Originally posted by TrueThinker
Come on, Jeremy. Are you really that daft? I'll quote that section for you again.
How daft of him to point out that you're shifting around the meanings of your words! Silly atheist!

Quote:
"The prince of Persia the principalities of Persia have once again stood up and said, we will not allow you entrance into our territory. But God says, because of the prayers of the saints of the most high God, I will surely stop it’s voice once again. And it shall take less than 21 days this time. God says, I will wipe him out with one shout from the people’s voice and I shall do it with My sword, says the Lord."
In this quote of yours used to "prove" Jeremy's statement to be false, the words "defiant" and "regime" are sorely lacking.
Try again, but this time use a real argument with valid support.
Godot is offline  
Old 05-13-2003, 02:50 PM   #22
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 126
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: November post

Quote:
Originally posted by Jeremy Pallant
Shame you weren't so precise the first time around. Stop shifting the goalposts.
"Prince and Principalities" referes to those who rule. The prince and principalities of Persia have stood up once again and said "We will not allow you entrance into our territory"- I just used the word defiant to describe this attitude although i did not include it in the statement. Is it really that difficult to understand? Now I'm shifting the goalposts? Or is that attitude I describe not defiant?

Did I change the words of the prohecy? No. You want change what it says. You want to argue "defiant regime" was not included in the original post. Looking to find some flaw so you can reject. Whatever.

"The voice will be stopped", "And it shall take less than 21 days". Is it really that difficult to read?

Do you see anywhere the mention of 'conflict'? If you do please point it out.

Don't forget this one:

"You Will Crush the Guilty Saddam and the Month of Iyar Will be Restful" (Iyar is the month of May in 2003 on the Jewish Calendar)

The President declared victory May 1st.
TrueThinker is offline  
Old 09-14-2003, 03:04 PM   #23
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 126
Default A Shaking shall take place

This nation has been under severe attack. But the Spirit of the Lord says, “Do not fear. I am exposing once, then twice, then three times in this next month.” “Those that are hidden, I will bring them to the fore,” says the Lord. “I demand that there be peace in the month of October. Because in the month of October, I will bring your President to a place of vindication because of what I am going to do and how I am going to reveal it,” says the Lord. “I want My people listen to the prophetic voice, because in the month of October, I will expose, I will expose, I will expose. And this nation shall rejoice greatly, for the glory of the Lord shall move in the month of October,” says the Lord. “America has been set aside for the month of October for divine vindication,” says the Lord. “Even the economy shall be raised up in the month of October. Take this and rejoice,” says the Lord, “for it shall be so!”

Yahweh says, "Watch the victory coming to your nation, America, for it shall cause your enemies to tremble."

"I’ll bring down not just one man, but I will take four nations and cause them to surrender in one moment."
TrueThinker is offline  
Old 09-16-2003, 02:36 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NZ
Posts: 7,895
Wink

Heh. I didn't know god was an American.
lunachick is offline  
Old 09-20-2003, 04:37 PM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the peach state ga I am a metaphysical naturalist
Posts: 2,869
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by lunachick
Heh. I didn't know god was an American.
well, shit it should be obvious. he is obnoxious and a war monger, and I know you think that that's american, and given recent actions I suppose that I am inclined to agree with you.
beyelzu is offline  
Old 09-21-2003, 07:55 PM   #26
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 126
Default I wonder again

from MSNBC:

Quote:
WASHINGTON, Sept. 21 — Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks, has told American interrogators that he first discussed the plot with Osama bin Laden in 1996 and that the original plan called for hijacking five commercial jets on each U.S. coast before it was modified several times, according to interrogation reports reviewed by The Associated Press.
Now that's an odd coincidence. It very interesting that the prophecy given concerning 9/11 was given that same year (scroll up a few posts to see what I mean). I am left wondering what day Shaikh Mohammed met with Osama Bin Laden. Was it on or around July 25th? What would the odds be of that happening? Hopefully this is revealed soon, cause I'd like to know.
TrueThinker is offline  
Old 09-22-2003, 06:51 AM   #27
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
Exclamation

DNFTT.
Shake is offline  
Old 10-20-2003, 07:30 PM   #28
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 126
Default Are you ready?

Are you ready for exposure #1? Prepare yourselves. (I know you all would desparately love to see me fall, but I've got God on my side, and He keeps His word. So I can take all the mocking you want to throw at me)

------
DNFTT? Was that your best response? I've been here longer than you have anyway. I just haven't posted as much since the board changed this year.
TrueThinker is offline  
Old 10-20-2003, 09:13 PM   #29
Beloved Deceased
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Carrboro, NC
Posts: 1,539
Default

TrueThinker, did you ever post as BladeX on the PayableOnDeath fan board?
WinAce is offline  
Old 10-21-2003, 10:22 AM   #30
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 422
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: November post

Quote:
Originally posted by TrueThinker
"Prince and Principalities" referes to those who rule. The prince and principalities of Persia have stood up once again and said "We will not allow you entrance into our territory"- I just used the word defiant to describe this attitude although i did not include it in the statement. Is it really that difficult to understand? Now I'm shifting the goalposts? Or is that attitude I describe not defiant?

Um... the lord your god needs geography and history lessons.

I hate to burst your bubble with a pesky thing like a fact but Persia is the traditional name of Iran not Iraq. If the "prophesy" would have refered to the "principalities of Babylon" or "principalities of the Ottoman Empire" it might be accurate to compare it to the current events in Iraq but as it stands it's completely off base.

Oh, and should you decide you want to shift your goalp..., uh, I mean "prophesy" to Iran, "pope and principalities of Persia" is probably a better phrase than "prince and principalities of Persia" to describe the Ayatollah and his cronies. Particularly if you're trying to make it sound old-timey like the rest of your supposed prophesies.
Aethernaut is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:09 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.