FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-29-2002, 01:43 PM   #141
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,938
Post

Just dropped in to read this thread for my daily dose of humor.

Personally, I found Mibby529's most interesting claim to be "I'm saying anti-Indian racism is politically correct. " Does a lot to explain his/her attitude. Reminds me of Xians who claim they're the ones being being persecuted. Similar illogical arguments, too.

penumbra is offline  
Old 08-29-2002, 02:25 PM   #142
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
Post

Quote:
ps418:
And perhaps you've forgotten already, but the genetic evidence already presented makes it quite clear that extant native americans are more closely related to northeast Siberian populations than any other population of earth.

Quote:
Mibby:
And perhaps you've forgotten that race doesn't exist genetically. Furthermore, perhaps you've forgotten that, as I said earlier, killing off 98% of a population has an effect on genetics.
Again, you are too busy flagellating your own ridiculous strawmen to read what I wrote. First, I am referring to populations, not nebulous races. That populations exist, and that genetic differences characterize different populations, is a fact. Second, I stated that "extant native americans are more closely related to northeast Siberian populations than any other population of earth," so your statement that 98% of the population was killed off is completely irrelevant. Now that we've cleared that up, how do you explain the genetic evidence presented in the paper I cited? Just another conspiracy perpetrated by da man?

<a href="http://hpgl.stanford.edu/publications/AJHG_2002_v70_p192-206.pdf" target="_blank">The Dual Origin and Siberian Affinities of Native American Y Chromosomes. American Journal of Human Genetics 70:192-206, 2002</a>

Quote:
ps418:
Let me reiterate for the 10th time now that there was no reason for immigrants to NA from Siberia to have gone into the mountains, since the continental shelf was exposed during sea-level lowstands.

Quote:
Mibby:
Your evidence for this? Once again, the existence of something doesn't prove man lived there.
Once again, I have already provided definitive evidence that man occupied the continental shelf during late glacial time. You ignored it. For instance, the following paper presents evidence for subarial exposure and human habitation of the northwest north american continental shelves at the end of the last glaciation:

Fedje, Daryl W., Heiner Josenhans, 2000. Drowned forests and archaeology on the continental shelf of British Columbia, Canada. Geology: Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 99–102.


Quote:
We have used high-resolution digital terrain imaging and sea-floor sampling to reveal drowned late glacial to early postglacial terrestrial landscapes at water depths as great as 150 m. In situ tree stumps and shellfish-rich paleobeaches are present on these drowned landscapes. A stone tool encrusted with barnacles and bryozoa was recovered from a drowned delta flood plain now 53 m below mean sea level. This is the first tangible evidence that the formerly subaerial broad banks of the western North American Continental Shelf may have been occupied by humans in earliest Holocene and possibly late-glacial time.
ps418 is offline  
Old 08-29-2002, 02:54 PM   #143
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hell
Posts: 399
Post

Mibby, why don't you just admit that you believe in some weird combination of evolution and Indian creation myths?
Cretinist is offline  
Old 08-29-2002, 03:15 PM   #144
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
Post

Quote:
Mibby:
Well, just saying that Beringia exists doesn't mean ppl crossed it. . . You'll have to explain the lack of herbivores.
Quote:
Lpetrich:
What lack?
Quote:
Mibby:
Point me to an herbivore fossil.
I should probably let this one go, but this is just too tempting. Mibby, are you really so ignorant as to think that there were no herbivores near Beringia? If so, I'll have to think of a new adjective to describe this level of ignorance. There are many Pleistocene sites with herbivore fossils in Alaska and Siberia. These include mammoths, bison and many other herbivores.

Here are some examples I found with 10 seconds worth of web-searching. You may want to try that sometime:

Gustafson, C.E., D. Gilbow and R.D. Daugherty. 1979. The Manis Mastodon site: early man on the Olympic Peninsula. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 3:157-164.

Guthrie, R.D. 1990. Frozen Fauna of the Mammoth Steppe. The Story of Blue Babe. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Harington, C.R. and F.V. Clulow. 1973. Pleistocene mammals from Gold Run Creek, Yukon Territory. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 10:697-759

Harington, C.R. 1978. Quaternary vertebrate faunas of Canada and Alaska and their suggested chronological sequence. Syllogeus 15:1-105.

Harington, C.R., 1989. Pleistocene Vertebrate Localities in the Yukon. In Late Cenozoic History of the Interior Basins of Alaska and the Yukon, ed. L.D. Carter, T.D. Hamilton and J.P. Galloway. U.S.G.S. Circular 10269, pp. 93-98.

Matheus, P.E. 1995. Diet and co-ecology of Pleistocene short-faced and brown bears in Eastern Beringia. Quaternary Research 44:447-453.

Morlan, R.E. 1987. The Pleistocene archaeology of Beringia. In The Evoloution of Human Hunting, edited by M.H. Nitecki and D.V. Nitecki, pp. 267-307. Plenum Press, New York.

Sternberg, C.M. 1960. New records of mastodons and mammoths in Canada. Canadian Field-Naturalist 44(3):59-65.

Vereshchagin, N.K. and Baryshnikov, O.F.,
1982. Paleoecology of the Mammoth Fauna in the Eurasian Arctic. In Paleoecology of Beringia, ed. D.M. Hopkins et al. (New York, Academic Press), pp. 267-279.
ps418 is offline  
Old 08-31-2002, 07:09 AM   #145
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 762
Post

A CNN story that ran yesterday:

<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/08/30/kennewick.man.ap/index.html" target="_blank">Judge: Scientists can study Kennewick Man</a>
Kevin Dorner is offline  
Old 09-02-2002, 02:02 PM   #146
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Cali
Posts: 170
Post

Quote:
Mibby, why don't you just admit that you believe in some weird combination of evolution and Indian creation myths?
I don't. I've had it up to here with you ppl. You clearly cannot think critically.
mibby529 is offline  
Old 09-02-2002, 02:14 PM   #147
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
Post

Mibby, before an actual participant has to say it: Pot. Kettle. Etcetera.
Coragyps is offline  
Old 09-03-2002, 01:47 AM   #148
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ecuador
Posts: 738
Post

Mibby:

I'm not asking you for a theory. I am even willing to (for the sake of discussion) stipulate all of your premises - no land bridge, no faunal exchange, no human migration from anywhere, no megafaunal extinctions, the whole idea was invented by Xian missionaries and conquistadores seeking to justify their genocide, etc.

However, my question is: since there is no doubt that North America was inhabited by humans prior to the arrival of the Europeans, where did the existing population come from?

Simple question requiring a straight answer. Not a strawman because I'm not trying to put words in your mouth. I'm not postulating or advocating any theory of any kind.

Where did the native americans come from?
Quetzal is offline  
Old 09-03-2002, 01:59 AM   #149
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by Coragyps:
<strong>Mibby, before an actual participant has to say it: Pot. Kettle. Etcetera.</strong>
I've wondered about that phrase recently. I now tend to use 'pot, refrigerator, black'.

Oolon
Oolon Colluphid is offline  
Old 09-03-2002, 02:44 AM   #150
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ecuador
Posts: 738
Question

Quote:
Originally posted by Oolon Colluphid:
<strong>

I've wondered about that phrase recently. I now tend to use 'pot, refrigerator, black'.

Oolon</strong>
I've been meaning to ask you about that - I don't get the reference. The "pot calling the kettle black" comes from the "good ol' days" when wood- or coal-burning stoves used to turn the bottoms of anything placed on the flame black with soot (you can see the modern homolog with a campfire - does the same thing). So where does the refrigerator bit come from?
Quetzal is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:08 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.