FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-19-2003, 10:20 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Madrid / I am a: Lifelong atheist
Posts: 885
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by atheist_in_foxhole
This is a little bit like the questions I asked theists (xian) on a thread a few months ago. I asked them if the naked Adam and Eve would have survived on the surface of the sun, in a blizzard, at the bottom of the ocean etc. in those happy "pre-fall" days before death came along, but they never really gave me an answer. One of them told me that god would send magic dolphins to rescue Adam/Eve if they ever fell into some water.

But if death didn't exist what would the "dolphins" be saving them from?
The Pre-Fall Adam and Eve were *mortal*, or else god would not have worried that they might eat of the Tree of Life.

Before the Fall, the myth says, death existed, but murder and predation did not.
beastmaster is offline  
Old 02-19-2003, 10:25 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Madrid / I am a: Lifelong atheist
Posts: 885
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Shake
Why would that be? Isn't the prevailing thought that he's just the creator, and put things in motion, but is certainly not actually sustaining the Universe?
The "prevailing thought" in religion is not to think.

In any event, the statement "God decides when we die" is not so much a metaphysical statement as it is a moral question -- i.e., humans should not intervene to "artificially" shorten or lengthen human life.
beastmaster is offline  
Old 02-19-2003, 02:09 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 2,047
Lightbulb Thus!

Quote:
Originally posted by beastmaster
In any event, the statement "God decides when we die" is not so much a metaphysical statement as it is a moral question -- i.e., humans should not intervene to "artificially" shorten or lengthen human life.
But then they imply that God forgot to take human intervention into account when he did his original calculations.
-RRH- is offline  
Old 02-19-2003, 04:09 PM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Deployed to Kosovo
Posts: 4,314
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Tercel
Er lpetrich, that's just silly. The people who claim that God decides when we die will almost inevitably hold to the position that if God "slacked off" then the universe itself would stop existing.
Hah, I'd like to see Biblical justification for THAT one.
Daggah is offline  
Old 02-20-2003, 05:39 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: heavenly Georgia
Posts: 3,862
Default

I'm not sure about younger theists but most of the older theists that I have ever spoken to have this firm belief that their time of death is already established by their god.

Just recently the caretaker of one of my patients got a little upset with me because I called his wife's physician to get her BP med changed as she had quite a significant elevation in her BP on the day of my visit. He said to me that it didn't really matter since it was already determined when she will die. He asked me if I beleived that and when I said, "No, I don't believe that", he got upset with me. However, we did get the med changed and her BP has returned to normal and he's had no further comments on the subject.

It's so strange because this elderly gentleman is a very intelligent, dear man who is one of the best care takers I've seen in a long time. Of course I would never say it, but I wanted to say, "Why do you take such good care of your wife if you think her time of death has been predetermined?"
southernhybrid is offline  
Old 02-20-2003, 01:36 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO.
Posts: 1,100
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by southernhybrid

Of course I would never say it, but I wanted to say, "Why do you take such good care of your wife if you think her time of death has been predetermined?"
For southernhybrid:

I work in health care also. On a somewhat similar note, I still see occaisional patients maintained on ventilators and intensive life support because their families are hoping for miraculous recoveries through divine intervention. I've always wanted to ask them why God would require a ventilator or dialysis machine. If He wished to cure someone, He surely could do it whether or not that person was on life support.
JerryM is offline  
Old 02-20-2003, 02:40 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,315
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Shake
Isn't the prevailing thought that he's just the creator, and put things in motion, but is certainly not actually sustaining the Universe?
No: standard teaching is that God is the creator and sustainer.

Technically if you think about it there is no difference between the two terms. God is alledged to be above time. He cannot, therefore, just "create" the universe and then go away and leave it to tick away like somebody who winds up a clock: Rather the entire space-time universe must get created and "sustained" at once.

Quote:
Originally posted by Dagah
Hah, I'd like to see Biblical justification for THAT one.
I'd be very suprised if there wasn't a significant amount of Biblical justification for that somewhere.
Tercel is offline  
Old 02-20-2003, 04:18 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Augusta, Georgia, United States
Posts: 1,235
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Zadok001
Piers Anthony, "On A Pale Horse."
I was thinking more along the lines of "The Family Guy" when Peter broke Death's foot, and Death (Norm MacDonald) was laid up at Peter's house, only Peter couldn't tell anyone, so only he knew that everybody was safe from Death. He did all kinds of that crazy stuff like the OP mentioned, and I think he even shot himself a few times. Ahhhhh, quality television!
Ensign Steve is offline  
Old 02-20-2003, 04:21 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Two Steps Ahead
Posts: 1,124
Default

I like my simile better, but I suppose your's holds in a pinch.
Zadok001 is offline  
Old 02-20-2003, 06:11 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 710
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by southernhybrid
I'm not sure about younger theists but most of the older theists that I have ever spoken to have this firm belief that their time of death is already established by their god.

Just recently the caretaker of one of my patients got a little upset with me because I called his wife's physician to get her BP med changed as she had quite a significant elevation in her BP on the day of my visit. He said to me that it didn't really matter since it was already determined when she will die. He asked me if I beleived that and when I said, "No, I don't believe that", he got upset with me. However, we did get the med changed and her BP has returned to normal and he's had no further comments on the subject.

It's so strange because this elderly gentleman is a very intelligent, dear man who is one of the best care takers I've seen in a long time. Of course I would never say it, but I wanted to say, "Why do you take such good care of your wife if you think her time of death has been predetermined?"
Being a theist, I'm not sure that the difference is so much between older theists and younger theists as much as the difference of opinion is between Calvinist Christians and non-Calvinist Christians.

Those who tend toward Calvinism (I am not one of them) have a tendency to believe that God has established dates for births, deaths, etc. Non-Calvinists usually do not hold those views.

Just my observations.

Kevin
spurly is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:08 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.