FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-11-2003, 11:33 PM   #51
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NYC, 5th floor, on the left
Posts: 372
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Attention, homosexual rights advocates

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
Naturally. This is a bad thing?
Is it a good one?

Quote:
Neither the prophets nor Christ held to that one.
I've never heard you call your beliefs "Biblically moral". You use the word traditional.

Quote:
Those insults bothered you? That surprises me, I must say. I mean, I actually backed off a tad on the second one by way of more civility, but I really thought it needed to be said.
I am a pretty tough cookie. Doesn't matter in the least whether they bothered me. They were inappropriate and were used to shut down conversation rather than promote it.
Daleth is offline  
Old 07-12-2003, 12:04 AM   #52
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Attention, homosexual rights advocates

Quote:
Originally posted by Daleth
Is it a good one?
In this case, yes, IMO. As evidence I cite the fact that Fr. Andrew is being held to account for his execrable thesis, even by people who think I'm an idiot. What could be bad about that?

Quote:
I've never heard you call your beliefs "Biblically moral". You use the word traditional.
There is consierable overlap between the two.

Quote:
I am a pretty tough cookie. Doesn't matter in the least whether they bothered me. They were inappropriate and were used to shut down conversation rather than promote it.
I had every intention of shutting down that line of discussion. It was going nowhere.
yguy is offline  
Old 07-12-2003, 01:47 AM   #53
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 235
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Attention, homosexual rights advocates

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
No, if you accept homosexuality, you unwittingly accept the force behind it, which in my view is also the force behind pedophilia and gluttony. That, however, is irrelevant to the purpose of the thread, which was to encourage those who favor homosexual rights to speak out against apologists for pedophilia.
Alright, I'd be glad to. I see nothing wrong with homosexual relationships but do not support paedophilia.

I also disagree that the "force" behind homosexuality is the same force behind paedophilia, at least the force I use. In my view, a sexual relationship based on mutual love, consent, no exploitation, commitment, etc., is acceptable. Homosexual relationships have the capacity to fulfill these criteria; paeophilic (is that a word?) relationships almost always would not, in my opinion. Underage people would rarely understand sexuality and relationships properly enough, nor would they understand love, intimacy, etc., to be capable of entering into an acceptable sexual relationship with a person significantly older than them, in my opinion.

As such, I see no contradiction between my opinion on homosexuality and my opinion on paedophilia, and any link drawn between the two is grossly inaccurate and downright offensive.
Groovy Cosmic Monkey is offline  
Old 07-12-2003, 02:23 AM   #54
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Attention, homosexual rights advocates

Quote:
Originally posted by Groovy Cosmic Monkey
Underage people would rarely understand sexuality and relationships properly enough, nor would they understand love, intimacy, etc., to be capable of entering into an acceptable sexual relationship with a person significantly older than them, in my opinion.
How does one learn these things? (assuming of course that they have to learned)

Or more precisely how does one transitioning from "underaged" to "aged" gain this understanding sans experience?

From what I recall of my teens it was a period of extreme frustration at having all the physical drives of an adult yet being treated as a child by everyone around me. I hated being told "you're not old enough" without any explanation as to how aging had anything to do with turning the urges I had from being "wrong" to being "right".

I think that experience is what I am trying to avoid happening for my children. (but it is bloody difficult so I can understand why many parents just avoid the issue altogether)

I think a counter example might help, a friend of mine happened to be from a different culture and his parents were divorced. He lived most of the year with his father in London and spent the holidays with his mother in Greece. When he reached puberty (about 12) his mother sent a Greek cousin over to stay with him as a sort of au-pair, she was about 17. Her job was to teach him about sex and although it was totally illegal under UK law that was the way of his culture so they just ignored the law.

He always seemed to me much more level headed and "grown up" than his peers and didn't suffer any harm from the experience, of course we were all as jealous as anything of his "good luck" at being born into a different culture than us.

All my cousin ever did for me was kick me in the nuts "just to see if it really hurt" as she put it.

Amen-Moses
Amen-Moses is offline  
Old 07-12-2003, 07:19 AM   #55
Honorary Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In the fog of San Francisco
Posts: 12,631
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Attention, homosexual rights advocates

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy

Quote:
Originally posted by Daleth
Far as I can tell based on your demeanor, your motivation was to provoke people.
Naturally. This is a bad thing?
yguy, let me remind you of this tidbit from the MF&P forum rules:

"MF&P is a place to discuss provocative (exciting or stimulating) concepts, not a place where people should be trying to provoke (inciting to anger) other users."

So yes, around here it is a bad thing, and I have little doubt that you are well aware of that.

Back off.

Michael
MF&P Moderator (Maximus)
The Other Michael is offline  
Old 07-13-2003, 09:41 AM   #56
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Twin Cities, USA
Posts: 3,197
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by john_v_h
Pedophilia advocates advocate homosexual rights.
Homosexual rights advocates advocate homosexual rights.
Therefore, homosexual rights advocates are pedophilia advocates.

Cats have four legs.
Dogs have four legs.
Therefore, cats are dogs.

Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle
:notworthy :notworthy :notworthy
Bree is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 09:14 AM   #57
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,931
Default

Most pedophiles are men.
Yguy is a man.
Therefore Yguy is a pedophile.
TomboyMom is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 10:28 AM   #58
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

While the last two posters may not be supporters of pedophilia, they are evidently supporters of the intellectually dishonest practice of distorting an opponent's statements so as to be able to refute the distortions as if they are refuting what their opponent actually said.

It is also interesting to note that neither shows nearly as much indignation towards an apologist for pedophilia as they do towards the idea that they may be unwittingly aiding such people by their silence. Not a good sign.
yguy is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 10:53 AM   #59
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: god's judge (pariah)
Posts: 1,281
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
While the last two posters may not be supporters of pedophilia, they are evidently supporters of the intellectually dishonest practice of distorting an opponent's statements so as to be able to refute the distortions as if they are refuting what their opponent actually said.

It is also interesting to note that neither shows nearly as much indignation towards an apologist for pedophilia as they do towards the idea that they may be unwittingly aiding such people by their silence. Not a good sign.
Actually what they did was identical to what you are doing. You see a parallel, which is nonexistant(according to the data, and common sense). You are doing exactly the same thing, and I'm surprised the irony has escaped you, since it's pretty blatant.
keyser_soze is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 11:26 AM   #60
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by keyser_soze
Actually what they did was identical to what you are doing.
Balderdash. I haven't distorted their positions in the least. On the other hand, practically no one here gives a second thought to distorting mine, while mostly being oh so circumspect in their efforts to give Fr. Andrew the benefit of doubt he doesn't deserve.

Quote:
You see a parallel, which is nonexistant(according to the data, and common sense).
That I see a connection between pedophilia and homosexuality is entirely tangential to the subject of the thread. The easiest way for people like Bree and TomboyMom to take the wind out of my sails would be to hold Fr. Andrew's feet to the fire. So far, they somehow find it more advantageous to focus on my perceived bigotry, when it is people like Fr. Andrew who are their real enemy.
yguy is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:35 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.