![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
View Poll Results: What type of motor vehicle do you prefer? | |||
Coupe/Sports Car |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
34 | 31.19% |
Convertible |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 7.34% |
Sedan |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
22 | 20.18% |
Hatchback |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 8.26% |
Wagon |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 3.67% |
SUV |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 8.26% |
Truck |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 7.34% |
Van |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 0.92% |
Crossover Vehicle (cross between wagon & SUV) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 0.92% |
Motorcycle |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 11.93% |
Voters: 109. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#51 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: no longer at IIDB
Posts: 1,644
|
![]()
My current car: Black 1991 Eagle Talon AWD TSi w/ sunroof. I'd like a newer Talon, but I am but an extremely poor college student.
If I had an awful lot of money to spend on a car (ie, I had the chance to use Bill Gates-esque funding, but only for buying and modifying a car), I can think of some cars I'd like to own, and mod like you wouldn't believe. My current pipe-dream mobile starts with a Mazda RX-8, which I would pay Mazda to put AWD in. I consider AWD to be a must. Then, I'd gut the bastard. I'd replace large portions of the frame with titanium, supplemented by high-grade carbon fiber. All the body panels would be made out of carbon fiber or kevlar, and would be coated in silverstone, and would be designed to resemble the '95 RX-7 more than the RX-8, as I don't much care for the body design of the RX-8. It would have twin turbos, one 5-incher and one no less than 14 inches. High end intake, manifold, filter, and exhaust, etc. Controlled by a custom designed ECU with accounting for turbos, and capable of optimizing fuel/air mix and other functions more than normal ECUs (kinda like an ECU with performance chips, only designed that way). All that good stuff. And those are just the major details ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: England
Posts: 8
|
![]()
I chose motorcycle , just love that raw feeling of horse power between my legs . vvrrrooooommmmm!!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: North of the South Pole
Posts: 5,177
|
![]() Quote:
I thought that the Buick motor, as good as it is for a sedate family car, was a bit dated too, with it's pushrods. It'll be good to see up-to-date engines in the home-grown line-up. I take it they are going to/have done away with the supercharged six option in the Statesman, then? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
|
![]()
How strange these curious preoccupations w/ steel cans so vulnerable to rust! How atavistic the drive to go zooming to somewhere/*any*where else as fast as possible/faster than anyone else!. What can it all mean? (Big fat shiny dick-substitutes for guys whose own don't satisfy their longing to be BIG-ENOUGH/fast-enough/"powerful"-enough?) How maximally-ununderstandable.....
|
![]() |
![]() |
#55 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Deployed to Kosovo
Posts: 4,314
|
![]() Quote:
(You do know your car's legacy, I hope...) - Proud owner of Plymouth Laser RS, but wishes it was a turbo and AWD Quote:
![]() Hey Putney, how's your Mustang handle? *snicker* Enjoying all that '80s technology? |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#56 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: no longer at IIDB
Posts: 1,644
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I highly recommend the AWD TSi (now, if I could just get a rotary for my car. mmmm...rotary engines.). Even though mine is currently in need of repairs ![]() I really don't understand why people like mustangs. Yeah, you can fit a big engine in 'em. Big deal. If I just wanted a big engine, I'd drive a truck. However, I don't feel a need to try to supplement the size of my penis with the size of my engine. I enjoy performance cars for the thrill of the drive, and handling is essential for that, as well as speed. Oh, and because, when I'm not driving for the thrill of it, I want to get wherever the hell I'm going ASAP, and not waste time in transit ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#57 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Statosphere, baby. I'm stacked over LaGuardia & I'm not coming down fo no body
Posts: 614
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#58 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: no longer at IIDB
Posts: 1,644
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Seriously, though, I've driven a couple mustangs, and I was not impressed at all with their handling (I won't say I was reminded of a brick; I'll reserve that for the mercury sable rental car I once drove, and an equally unweildy chevy caprice. ugh). It definitely was not signifigantly better than any other car I've driven, and was, in fact, worse than several. Maybe it was just something about the 1995 and 1997 model year mustangs, though? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 112
|
![]() Quote:
As for the 3.8L Buick V6, I don't think you could find a more asthmatic and unbalanced block of iron if you scoured the globe. It did its thing, and it's [way past] time for it to be laid to rest. The only thing I'm really hanging out for is a turbo V6 SS-X Monaro (AWD). Finally something to take on the GT-R Skylines, EVO Lancers and WRX/STi's. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#60 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: North of the South Pole
Posts: 5,177
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|