Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-31-2002, 02:03 PM | #21 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cambridge, England, but a Scot at heart
Posts: 2,431
|
So someone pushing an agenda you dislike should a priori be considered an unreliable source of information, while somebody pushing an agenda you agree with or don't particularly mind should not? Fair enough. As a fellow freethinker I wish you well in coming to the conclusion that you have already decided on.
|
01-31-2002, 02:42 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: I`ve left and gone away
Posts: 699
|
Quote:
It`s not a matter of me disliking a certain agenda,but rather not trusting a source who`s agenda is not in the least bit logical or realistic. I`m sorry but I don`t trust any info from an institution who has been lying through their teeth for the last 2000 years and blaming the devil for anything and everything that contradicts them. Maybe my position automatically forfeits me from any chance of winning your "freethinker of the year award" but I guess thats something I`ll have to live with. Btw, I didn`t say the pagan sources were 100% reliable,but rather that they tend to have more facts straight than those witth a Christian agenda. [ January 31, 2002: Message edited by: Anunnaki ]</p> |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|