FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Philosophy & Religious Studies > Moral Foundations & Principles
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 08:25 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-10-2005, 09:07 AM   #51
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jehanne
Everyone,

y,

uh, this is gv Bob,

look son, every nation that has fallen lost its way morally first.
Thats why he's going to die.
jonesg is offline  
Old 08-10-2005, 09:18 AM   #52
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jehanne
death itself may someday constitute “cruel and unusual�? punishment.


.
Death is not just expected, its guarenteed and its not unusual in the least, its a natural consequence of a life lived.
Execution protects the concept of preciousness of your own life.

Such an illogical plea went to the supreme court, thinking that the elec chair is dangeropus is insane , Sandra Day O'conner laughed and asked if they thought the chair should be rated by UL (safety tested in case someone gets hurt).

Perhaps the real problem is life doesn't mean life in jail, I know a guy, personally, who murdered his roomate, got out after 6 yrs and murdered his neighbor. He's out again !, Thats liberal Massachusetts.
The death penalty isn't meant to deter (although it deters me) its meant to STOP them dead in their tracks and it works 100%.
jonesg is offline  
Old 08-10-2005, 09:26 AM   #53
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jehanne
These links are not really a reponse to my comments. I am very familiar with PDs, having done much research. I do not see where on your links, or in any literature on the subject, the effectiveness of various treatments are evidenced. In fact, most of my reading states PDs are difficult if not impossible to treat. Perhaps you could quote the pertinent passage as well as offer the link, in case I didn't find it?

Quote:
Life in prison without parole:
Reasonable enough. The only problem I see is that some killers, like child murderer Arthur Shawcross, somehow slip or manipulate their way through the system and get paroled. After his parole, Shawcross went on a killing spree leaving 11 women dead.


Quote:
http://www.autism.org/dsm.html

Note the article's emphasis on "antisocial" behavior. Here's the DSM criteria:

http://www.psychologynet.org/autism.html
Once again I am familiar with autism, and I could not find anything regarding violence or murder correlating to autism on the link you offered.
Viti is offline  
Old 08-10-2005, 09:47 AM   #54
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonesg
I know a guy, personally, who murdered his roomate, got out after 6 yrs and murdered his neighbor. He's out again !, Thats liberal Massachusetts.
The death penalty isn't meant to deter (although it deters me) its meant to STOP them dead in their tracks and it works 100%.
I met a woman (married with a baby) who had shot and killed her brother after a fight over the TV remote when she was 15. She never even was required to get treatment.
Viti is offline  
Old 08-10-2005, 09:54 AM   #55
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,567
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonesg
Death is not just expected, its guarenteed and its not unusual in the least, its a natural consequence of a life lived.
Execution protects the concept of preciousness of your own life.
If this is true, one must wonder why the European Union, which imprisons a fraction of the people the US imprisons and has no death penalty, somehow has a lower murder and violent crime rate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonesg
Such an illogical plea went to the supreme court, thinking that the elec chair is dangeropus is insane , Sandra Day O'conner laughed and asked if they thought the chair should be rated by UL (safety tested in case someone gets hurt).
Perhaps it is good that she is retiring! The electric chair is now de facto unconstitutional “cruel and unusual�? punishment. The Nebraska Supreme Court is expected to declare it unconstitutional here very soon, following in the footsteps of other state supreme courts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonesg
Perhaps the real problem is life doesn't mean life in jail, I know a guy, personally, who murdered his roomate, got out after 6 yrs and murdered his neighbor. He's out again !, Thats liberal Massachusetts.
The death penalty isn't meant to deter (although it deters me) its meant to STOP them dead in their tracks and it works 100%.
Or, perhaps having the death penalty leads to more murders, not fewer. One need only look at the Middle Ages with its constant cycle of wars and violence and its regular public, often gruesome, displays of executions. (“It’s the statistics, stupid,�? as James Carville might say!)
Jehanne is offline  
Old 08-10-2005, 10:03 AM   #56
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,567
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
These links are not really a reponse to my comments. I am very familiar with PDs, having done much research. I do not see where on your links, or in any literature on the subject, the effectiveness of various treatments are evidenced. In fact, most of my reading states PDs are difficult if not impossible to treat. Perhaps you could quote the pertinent passage as well as offer the link, in case I didn't find it?
It's in the DSM section on Axis II personality disorders. Clearly, early intervention is the key here. (In other words, the government should not cut extracurricular programs in music, sports, art, etc.!) Again, I never claimed that PDs could (or should) be treated.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Reasonable enough. The only problem I see is that some killers, like child murderer Arthur Shawcross, somehow slip or manipulate their way through the system and get paroled. After his parole, Shawcross went on a killing spree leaving 11 women dead.
The death penalty would not matter here, as the jury and/or judge determines a sentence of death after a person is convicted.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
Once again I am familiar with autism, and I could not find anything regarding violence or murder correlating to autism on the link you offered.
Read the DSM criteria for autistic spectrum disorder again. The most important determinant of autism is the inability to form relationships. Now, look at those who are on death row. Most are uneducated, most were abused as children, the majority were never married, most used drugs, most were unable to form meaningful relationships, etc., etc. Having autism does not necessary lead to crime, but many criminals are autistic, have ADHD, OCD, bipolar disorder, etc. Again, would early intervention have made a difference in some of these people’s lives??
Jehanne is offline  
Old 08-10-2005, 10:07 AM   #57
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,567
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyShea
I met a woman (married with a baby) who had shot and killed her brother after a fight over the TV remote when she was 15. She never even was required to get treatment.
Again, the death penalty would not apply here! One, it is unconstitutional to execute someone who committed a crime prior to turning 18; two, the case that you are referring to is with respect to a person’s conviction, not her sentence. (Clearly, if she had been convicted of first degree murder, she would be in prison now!)
Jehanne is offline  
Old 08-10-2005, 10:22 AM   #58
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jehanne
It's in the DSM section on Axis II personality disorders. Clearly, early intervention is the key here. (In other words, the government should not cut extracurricular programs in music, sports, art, etc.!) Again, I never claimed that PDs could (or should) be treated.
Then you response was not to my comments at all, as I was specifically discussing the effectiveness of treatment for anti-social personality disorders, which would cover the majority of serial or spree killers.

Quote:
The death penalty would not matter here, as the jury and/or judge determines a sentence of death after a person is convicted.
Had he been executed for the murders of the two children, he could not have gone on his killing spree of 11 women 25 years later.

Quote:
Read the DSM criteria for autistic spectrum disorder again. The most important determinant of autism is the inability to form relationships. Now, look at those who are on death row.
Sociopaths also have trouble forming relationships because they have no empathy or compassion. Autism may share a few traits with sociopathology, but they are very different diagnoses. Autism is not correlated with violence.

Quote:
Most are uneducated, most were abused as children, the majority were never married, most used drugs, most were unable to form meaningful relationships, etc., etc. Having autism does not necessary lead to crime, but many criminals are autistic, have ADHD, OCD, bipolar disorder, etc. Again, would early intervention have made a difference in some of these people’s lives??
Many criminals are sociopaths. Intervention might/might not make a difference in those cases, but anti-social PD is difficult to recognize because sociopaths are often charming, intelligent, charismatic and manipulative and they function seemingly normally. How can you intervene if you do not know there is an issue?

Those other disorders mentioned such as ADD, OCD, and bi-polar usually present symptoms, rarely cause people to become criminals or murderers and yes, early intervention will probably help. I fail to see your point in bringing them up or how that helps your argument against the death penalty.


Either way, you have not evidenced your claim that autism is correlated with violence, so I assume you will now retract it?
Viti is offline  
Old 08-10-2005, 10:32 AM   #59
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jehanne
Again, the death penalty would not apply here! One, it is unconstitutional to execute someone who committed a crime prior to turning 18; two, the case that you are referring to is with respect to a person’s conviction, not her sentence. (Clearly, if she had been convicted of first degree murder, she would be in prison now!)
The fact is, she was not treated, no intervention. She may explode and kill again. I wasn't making any other point except that our society doesn't seem to do well on the intervention thing you keep mentioning. If shooting your brother over a mundane argument isn't a big red flag then what the hell is?.
Viti is offline  
Old 08-10-2005, 10:48 AM   #60
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jehanne
If this is true, one must wonder why the European Union, which imprisons a fraction of the people the US imprisons and has no death penalty, somehow has a lower murder and violent crime rate.
Experts also want to understand why we have such a high violent crime rate compared to other Western countries. They haven't figured it out yet.

Also, some countries with capital punishment have lower crime rates than we do. The death penalty in and of itself does not seem to correlate with the crime rate of any given country.


Quote:
Or, perhaps having the death penalty leads to more murders, not fewer.
Perhaps, but I don't think there is evidence of that yet.



ETA: It would be really helpful to this discussion if you could include the pertinent quotes or sections you are referencing and use the links for citations and more complete information, rather than just giving me (us) a link and saying "read this".
Viti is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:49 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.