FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-06-2003, 07:12 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: On a sailing ship to nowhere, leaving any place
Posts: 2,254
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by crazyfingers
I have no particular stake in this issue but I am glad to see it. Every once in a while it's good to be reminded that not all theists are fundies.

It's interesting that we almost never hear about the Episcopals and the Methodists.
Perhaps America's Great Silent Majority (tm), as opposed to Nixon and Falwell's assertions, is not all that reactionary and conservative as the relevent pundits wish us to believe.
Demigawd is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 08:16 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gilead
Posts: 11,186
Default

Quote:
It's interesting that we almost never hear about the Episcopals and the Methodists.
Very true. If you went by media attention alone, you'd think that 99% of Americans were Southern Baptists.
Roland98 is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 04:09 AM   #13
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 279
Default

I just goes to show that Christians use their brains and not the Bible in most cases.
scumble is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 05:09 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: umop apisbn
Posts: 568
Default

Smart choice for them. With the way attitudes in society are heading, it's eventually going to be a matter of survival for them. Basically, they're going to have to accept homosexuality, or become irrelevant.

After all, the church is primarily a social institution. To pretend it can't be affected by changes in that society is ridiculous.
andy_d is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 05:57 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bicester UK
Posts: 863
Default

Concerning the row in the Episcopalian church, it is important to realise that the debate is not merely about homosexuality, it is about the very nature of Anglicanism.

Since its inception, when Henry VIII had the hots for Anne Boleyn, Anglicanism has been a kind of half way house between Protestantism with its emphasis on scriptural authority and Catholicism and its hierarchical authority based on the apostolic succession, contonued revelation and papal infallibility etc.

Anglicanism has never resolved whether the authority for its belief is primarily scriptural, hierarchical (since they also claim apostolic succession), or latterly democratic with the development of representative Synods.

The argument over Gene Robinson is simply bringing that old tension into the open. What is the status of a decision by the hierarchy and the representative institutions which contradicts scripture?
Howay the Toon is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:14 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.