FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-31-2002, 05:48 AM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
Posts: 5,814
Post

OK, a bit of armchair philosophy. How can 'space' be anything but infinitely big in size. even if you limit space, what is beyond the limit? if the answer is nothing than that is still 'space', so it's not a limit at all, and if there is something beyond that limit, than it's still not a limit. So i guess the question i am asking is how can you limit the universe? even if there is finite matter, how can it possibly exist in a finite space?
kwigibo is offline  
Old 01-31-2002, 05:52 AM   #32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Farnham, UK
Posts: 859
Post

"If all possible moments exist and no others can be added then there is a finite number of moments. "

But if all possible moments defines an infinite set none could be added because you cannot add to an infinite number, its already infinite.

Adrian
Adrian Selby is offline  
Old 01-31-2002, 06:04 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Yes, I have dyslexia. Sue me.
Posts: 6,508
Talking

What she said!
Koyaanisqatsi is offline  
Old 01-31-2002, 07:22 AM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Harrisburg, Pa
Posts: 3,251
Lightbulb

No. Infinity + 1 = Infinity
Static sets are finite.

Any point at which you stop adding to (or subtracting from) a set the set becomes finite.
Draygomb is offline  
Old 01-31-2002, 07:37 AM   #35
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 92
Post

kwigibo:
OK, a bit of armchair philosophy. How can 'space' be anything but infinitely big in size. even if you limit space, what is beyond the limit?

Jonsey3333:
You fall off the side of the universe. Duh.
<a href="http://www.flat-earth.org/society/" target="_blank">Flat Earth Society</a>

- Mike
Jonsey3333 is offline  
Old 01-31-2002, 07:49 AM   #36
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 966
Post

To clear up a few misconceptions:

Quote:
Theo: It is quite possible to reach a particular combination such that ceratin other combinations simply could never arise.

Draygomb: True, but if change continues to occur then eventually some possible combinations must be repeated.
No. If the rules of cause and effect in that universe are such that no chain of events possible from X can produce Y, combination Y will never occur again once X has occurred.

Quote:
Adrian: But if all possible moments defines an infinite set none could be added because you cannot add to an infinite number, its already infinite.
Dray actually got this one right, you can keep adding to an infinite set. As an example, take the set of even numbers; an infinite set, yes? Now start adding odd numbers to it: 1, 3, 5, etc. You still have an infinite set, but you've added elements it didn't have before.
Theophage is offline  
Old 01-31-2002, 07:56 AM   #37
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Farnham, UK
Posts: 859
Post

Hmm, I'm almost certainly showing my ignorance here, but I'm open to being put right.

Infinity+1=Infinity

Why can't infinity only be equal to itself, and if there is infinity, if one is able to add 1 to it, it couldn't have been infinity, because it was less than when the 1 was added.

I'm not sure how a 'set' can contain anything infinite. I suppose if one described the set of all possible numbers as an infinite set, I would want to look more closely at whether there's a difference between 'all possible numbers' and 'infinite numbers'. It appears that when the words all possible numbes are used, it can be described as a set. But when I say 'a set containing an infinite amount of numbers' I don't feel comfortable saying it, as vague as that is, because I would automatically frown at what such a phrase could mean.

Do you see a distinction between 'infinite numbers' and 'all possible numbers'? Or is it the case that if they're identical in meaning, it wouldn't make sense to talk of a 'set' of infinite numbers/all possible numbers.

Adrian
Adrian Selby is offline  
Old 01-31-2002, 08:26 AM   #38
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Montreal, QC Canada
Posts: 876
Post

If I remember my physics classes correctly, space is limited and unbounded.

It is a bit misleading to talk about bounds of the universe, since the universe does not "expand" as such - there is nothing for it to expand in. But I suppose it's a good analogy. Imagine the universe as the flat surface of a balloon that keeps inflating.
Francois Tremblay is offline  
Old 01-31-2002, 08:42 AM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Harrisburg, Pa
Posts: 3,251
Lightbulb

If you go straight forward far enough you will end up right where you were.

Adrian
You've noticed the problem with infinites, they don't make sense. Infinity - Infinity can = Infinity or Zero or Negative Infinity and still be right.

Theo
Quote:
No. If the rules of cause and effect in that universe are such that no chain of events possible from X can produce Y, combination Y will never occur again once X has occurred.
But that doesn't stop A and B from reoccuring constantly.

[ January 31, 2002: Message edited by: Draygomb ]</p>
Draygomb is offline  
Old 01-31-2002, 09:30 AM   #40
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 80
Post

Keep in mind that there are different sizes of infinity (there are more real numbers than natural numbers for example). In mathematics, each set is assigned a certain cardinal number, which represents just how big the set is. It turns out that the sets {...,-2,-1,0,1,2,...} and {0,1,2,...} have the same infinite size (you can pair off the elements), and so they are assigned the same cardinal number, which is usually called aleph_0. Now one can define addition, multiplication, and exponentiation of cardinal numbers so that it makes sense to ask what the values of aleph_0 + aleph_0 and aleph_0 * aleph_0 are. The real numbers are bigger than the natural numbers (you can not pair off the real numbers with the natural numbers), and have size 2^(aleph_0) (that is, 2 raised to the aleph_0 power).

Quote:
You've noticed the problem with infinites, they don't make sense. Infinity - Infinity can =
Infinity or Zero or Negative Infinity and still be right.
When properly defined in mathematics (and not used in same vague imprecise philosophical way), the concept of infinity makes just as much sense as any other branch of mathematics. There are precise definitions for how to add, multiply, and exponentiate ordinal and cardinal numbers as discussed above (although subtraction may not be well-defined in the usual sense). I strongly urge everyone here to learn some serious set theory before making wild philosophical claims about what can and can't be done mathematically with infinity.

CardinalMan
CardinalMan is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:40 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.