FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-26-2002, 05:48 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
Post

ummmmm. (Just insert this comment >>>&gt My Impression Izzz that the observable fact that one can OUTGROW bubbsolatry may have some significance. Tho, what significance I've not bothered to figure yet. Also, add qy: Do others of yez concur that there are upper limits of overbulging blubbery beyond wh/ boobs cease to be desirable? (As I look about me, waiting at the bus terminal.)
abe smith is offline  
Old 08-26-2002, 09:11 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Eastern U.S.
Posts: 1,230
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Frogsmoocher:

May I ask where you obtained this information? I spent several years working in women's health, and I've never heard this.
The British zoologist Desmond Morris makes a big deal about this in some of his writings. It has been awhile since I've read anything on the specific subject, though, so I can't say how well thought-of the notion is today.


Quote:
Large breasts are just fat deposits in a nice area, which is why you don't often see a very slender woman with big boobs (real ones, anyway).


Actually, that's precisely Morris' point. Only women who are healthy and well-fed during adolescence will be able to lay down enough fat deposits to have large breasts. Keep in mind that too-low body fat impairs a woman's fertility, and women with very low body fat stop menstruating entirely. The current fascination with waif-thin women is a very recent aberration.

Quote:
I disagree. I spent all of this weekend at an amusement park which included a water park, and saw many a young girl in swimsuits. I noticed very few young, healthy girls who were large-breasted. The large-breasted girls I saw were mostly overweight, and lots of the normal-weighted girls had obvious padding in their tops.
See above. Most human societies of the past have idealized heavy women as being particularly desirable mates, not skinny ones. That there has been such a rapid change in the past couple of generations in Western societies demonstrates that there is a considerable amount of plasticity in what is considered attractive.

Interestingly, there have been some fairly recent studies (I remember reading about them in Time, I think it was, a few years ago) in which men were asked to judge the attractiveness of women of various weights. Men consistently judged women of a certain hips/waist ratio as being most attractive, suggesting that there may be some "hardwiring" to seek out hourglass-shaped women. What was most interesting, though, is that most men rated women of model-thinness as being less attractive than somewhat heavier women. To some extent, the obsession for thin-ness in young women may be driven more by advertisers than by "what men really want."


Quote:
Asking why some men like breasts is like asking why some women like broad shoulders on men, or hairy chests or beards.


Yes, that's very much the point. These are signals which quickly and reliably indicate the sex of the bearer. This doesn't mean that there aren't other factors to consider, though. For instance, broad shoulders in men not only help to identify the individual's sex, but provide some indication of his health. It's not so surprising that women would generally prefer broad-shouldered men to narrow-shouldered ones, therefore.

Quote:
Originally posted by abe smith:

Do others of yez concur that there are upper limits of overbulging blubbery beyond wh/ boobs cease to be desirable?
As a rule, I don't find very large breasts to be attractive.

Cheers,

Michael
The Lone Ranger is offline  
Old 08-26-2002, 02:46 PM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,635
Post

One simple explanation is that breast are a good visual indicator that a female is mature enough to have offspring.

Quote:
Originally posted by Definitely Maybe:
<strong>Okay, this is a bit silly... I can understand the evolution of sexual attraction, but why are we men attracted to boobies and not just the nether regions? What would be the point of being turned on by thems gems?</strong>
doubtingt is offline  
Old 08-28-2002, 09:39 PM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: next door to H.P. Lovecraft
Posts: 565
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by doubtingt:
<strong>One simple explanation is that breast are a good visual indicator that a female is mature enough to have offspring.
</strong>
Well, jeez.... if that were the case, I'd be infertile.
2tadpoles is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:45 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.