FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-23-2002, 09:50 AM   #211
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by pz:
<strong>Yeah, and all four of us moderators are contributing to the topic drift!</strong>
And as such, it ain't moving!!!!!!
RufusAtticus is offline  
Old 12-24-2002, 03:23 PM   #212
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
Post

Well, I seem to recall that church membership is up a bit over a hundred years ago, but I'm not sure whether that's progress made or progress unmade.

I have to say, Rufus, I agree with you wholeheartedly. If only the moderates were the ones
willing to force others to adhere to their beliefs, this would be a non-issue.
seebs is offline  
Old 12-24-2002, 03:44 PM   #213
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 552
Post

Hello. Let me give you my opinions on Creationism. I am a theistic evolutionist, something of an extreme version of Old Earth Creationist but we reject the Genesis account historically and scientifically because it didn't happen. The two largest churches in the world- the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church, follow theistic evolution, so it's not just something that a few people here and there came up with.

I believe that fundamentalists cannot let go of the Genesis account because it tells them that they are special creatures far superior to everything else. They cannot reject it because rejecting it would be rejecting the Bible. Most Creationists are uneducated and cannot interpret the Bible the way it was meant to be, so they just take it word for word. As for the educated Creationists, well, they are just unreasonable. I have much to say about Creationism and my views on fundamentalism, but I'll start a new thread one of these days about it.

Here's a link about "Creation Science" by Lenny Flank. He claims to be a reverend: <a href="http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/2437/" target="_blank">http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/2437/</a> He best states the religous side of it in "Creationism is not just bad science, it's bad theology, as well."
notMichaelJackson is offline  
Old 12-24-2002, 09:32 PM   #214
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: secularcafe.org
Posts: 9,525
Post

I would say this topic has, not drifted, but evolved.

We are pretty much in agreement (IMO) that creationism is so common in the US as a result of a combination of factors- historical, as in the lack of major religious warfare in our history; political, the attempt by certain elements of the Republican right wing to use fundamentalism to enhance their power at the expense of the Democrats; and statistical, due to the loud mouths in marginal positions. Insufficient education about biology and evolution at the elementary and high school levels means that one can reach adulthood without any real understanding of those.

This thread has advanced to the question of what to do about the situation; Rufus and I (among others) are trying to convince Starboy (and others) that opposing Christianity per se is an ineffective way to oppose creationism, which is a point of view being pushed only by certain right wing protestant sects and individuals.

Now, seeing as how both Rufus and I are mods on a by-and-large atheist forum, it's a bit silly to say that we don't think Christianity is outmoded, even harmful, in many ways. We do think that. What we are both clear on, though, is that Christianity is not equivalent to creationism. Seebs, Bubba, Rev. Joshua, Rufus' wife, and my own moderate Southern Baptist family members are not creationists! In the larger scheme of things- preventing rigid and unthinking religious dogma from damaging science, or trying to masquerade as science- many, indeed most, Christians should be recognized as our allies, either active or passive.

On a more intellectual level, when the subject is specifically theology, the lines of debate and disagreement form along the lines that Starboy draws. Politics, though, makes strange bedfellows- I am on the same side seebs is, when the topic is creationism, or church-state separation. (And I leave to others to ask Rufus about bedroom politics, and where the lines are drawn in that particular venue! )
Jobar is offline  
Old 12-24-2002, 09:38 PM   #215
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Jobar:
<strong>
On a more intellectual level, when the subject is specifically theology, the lines of debate and disagreement form along the lines that Starboy draws. Politics, though, makes strange bedfellows- I am on the same side seebs is, when the topic is creationism, or church-state separation. (And I leave to others to ask Rufus about bedroom politics, and where the lines are drawn in that particular venue! )</strong>
Here's the thing.

Disagreements about what to teach in schools, or where the church/state line goes, are things on which "agree to disagree" doesn't work; we *have* to have a line somewhere, and we need to do our best to hash the issue out to find a result everyone's happy with.

Theology, we don't need to agree on. The world could happily continue for another two thousand years, and my great-great-great-great-great grandchildren may someday try to convince yours that the God thing is just plain silly. Fine by me. I value the diversity of opinion I see in the world, because it gives me something to challenge my beliefs with.

So, I think the *important* line to draw is the one of what actions we actually take in the world. Personal beliefs are just that - personal. I say that, the sooner we can get almost everyone to agree on that, the sooner we can eliminate the things that have made this such a sore spot, and all be a lot happier.
seebs is offline  
Old 12-31-2002, 06:58 PM   #216
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL Reality Adventurer
Posts: 5,276
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by seebs

Disagreements about what to teach in schools, or where the church/state line goes, are things on which "agree to disagree" doesn't work; we *have* to have a line somewhere, and we need to do our best to hash the issue out to find a result everyone's happy with.
Greetings,

Please excuse my long absence from this thread.

Where to draw the line is the crux of the matter, especially when it is being drawn on the backs of non-Christians. I see that many view me as alarmist, but I will continue to be alarmed as long as that line keeps creeping towards church and state and away from a secular society. Yes I agree, it is creeping slowly, but that doesn't mean it should be ignored. After all, the way you boil a lobster without it noticing is to put it in the pot when the water is cold and increase the heat slowly.

Starboy
Starboy is offline  
Old 12-31-2002, 10:00 PM   #217
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 136
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by seebs
Quote:

So, I think the *important* line to draw is the one of what actions we actually take in the world. Personal beliefs are just that - personal. I say that, the sooner we can get almost everyone to agree on that, the sooner we can eliminate the things that have made this such a sore spot, and all be a lot happier.
I agree completely.
seesaw is offline  
Old 01-01-2003, 06:18 PM   #218
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Starboy

Where to draw the line is the crux of the matter, especially when it is being drawn on the backs of non-Christians. I see that many view me as alarmist, but I will continue to be alarmed as long as that line keeps creeping towards church and state and away from a secular society. Yes I agree, it is creeping slowly, but that doesn't mean it should be ignored. After all, the way you boil a lobster without it noticing is to put it in the pot when the water is cold and increase the heat slowly.
I don't think we're creeping towards either; I think there's constant low-level flux, and most of it makes no difference at all.

Keep in mind, I can find just as many Christians who are worried about policies which appear to prohibit personal expressions of belief; their concerns are just as valid as yours, inasmuch as they reflect people being told what thoughts they may or may not express.

I think that, on the whole, the problem is getting better - but the fundamentalists on both sides are making it a lot harder than it needs to be.
seebs is offline  
Old 01-06-2003, 06:40 AM   #219
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
Default Why creatiomists?

Because folks who a'n't too-bright love the *mysterious* because any fool can assert it w/o having to KNOW anything factual, nor to STUDY to learn anything.
Believing in the inexplicable/miraculous makes the ignorant equal with the informed; and whee! "OI'm as smot as YEW are!."
abe smith is offline  
Old 01-06-2003, 02:13 PM   #220
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
Default

I know many people who believe in inexplicable/miraculous things exist. Yet I have never ever seen them explain an event that way.
RufusAtticus is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:46 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.