Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-17-2002, 03:45 AM | #61 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 5,878
|
(An aside: I sometimes wonder what benefit to mankind has been the story of an Intelligent Designer; I certainly don't see that ID has improved my life. Mr Van will burble on about morality, but that hypothesis has been so well and truly debunked that only the likes of Mr Van are able to repeat it without a derisory smile. )
|
08-17-2002, 07:58 AM | #62 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 762
|
Here's a more recent example of a evolutionary algorithm in action.
<a href="http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/cybernews/story/0,1870,137917,00.html?" target="_blank">Robot teaches itself to fly</a> Quote:
Quote:
[ August 17, 2002: Message edited by: Kevin Dorner ]</p> |
||
08-17-2002, 08:43 AM | #63 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 913
|
Quote:
Sounds a lot like RM&NS to me....... but then what do I know, I've only been programming for almost 30 years. And to re-inforce what other's have said, everyone for whom I've written software expects that the software will continue to work long after I have lost interest and have completely forgotten about it. |
|
08-17-2002, 10:14 AM | #64 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
|
Quote:
Thanks to all who expounded upon this point at a level even I can understand. Rick |
|
08-19-2002, 01:38 AM | #65 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 5,878
|
(Things have moved on, and I've been away, but I didn't want Vanderzyden to get away with thinking it is sufficient to prove a point by quoting fiction, as he did in a response earlier on in this thread)
Dear Mr V, quoting a character from fiction who has been loaded with the prejudices of its creator is evidence of your familiarity with that particular work of fiction; it is not evidence of any particular truth. The point I made, and which you did not answer, is that we cannot pick and choose which areas of human curiosity shall be permitted because exploring them will be sure to massage the collective human ego. Your description of Darwin’s discoveries - which arose not because he was following a Satanic agenda to undermine the Bible but simply because he was curious and had the energy and wit to go about methodically to satisfy it - as "dangerous" illustrates a Medieval mind-set which would have locked Mankind into Church-sponsored ignorance and superstition. If that’s the world you want, go there, but I for one would resist with all my power being dragged back there with you |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|