Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-09-2003, 02:14 PM | #31 | |
Moderator - Science Discussions
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Providence, RI, USA
Posts: 9,908
|
Quote:
|
|
05-09-2003, 02:18 PM | #32 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 9
|
I now agree that the problem is messed up. There is no situation where the sum person can figure it out in the end.
|
05-09-2003, 02:27 PM | #33 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW 31 52 24W4
Posts: 1,508
|
I tried to solve this and came up with the exact same results as Jesse.
In order for Polly to know the answer after Sam says he know's she doesn't, the numbers must be one of the following combinations: Sum = 13 3, 10 4, 9 5, 8 6, 7 Sum = 19 3, 16 4, 15 5, 14 8, 11 9, 10 Sum = 25 3, 22 6, 19 7, 18 8, 17 9, 16 12, 13 Sum = 29 5, 24 6, 23 9, 20 10, 19 12, 17 13, 16 Sum = 31 4, 27 5, 26 8, 23 11, 20 12, 19 13, 18 14, 17 15, 16 None of these allow Sam to know the answer. I tried adding 2 and 50 to the list of possible numbers and there still is not a solution that allows Sam to figure out the answer. |
05-09-2003, 02:29 PM | #34 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Indeterminate
Posts: 447
|
Yeah, there's either no answer or I'm utterly stumped. I'm at the same spot Jesse is:
13: 30 36 40 42 19: 48 60 70 88 90 25: 66 114 126 136 144 156 29: 120 138 180 190 204 208 31: 108 130 184 220 228 234 238 240 The sums (13, 19, 25, 29, 31) are the only sums that one can exclude the possibility of the product in and of itself giving away the answer. Then we take all of the products that can be made based on numbers adding to that sum as possible products. Then we remove those that are duplicated in the above list, as those duplicates (78, 84, 100, 150, 154, 168, 198, 210) don't let Polly determine the correct answer. The last bit is Sam should, theoretically, be able to determine an answer based on the knowledge that Polly was able to determine an answer with the given information. But that bit of information only clears out a few from the list, and doesn't give a single sum that has exactly one remaining possible product. |
05-09-2003, 02:44 PM | #35 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 2,846
|
Assuming the problem is solvable, there must be something inherent in the sum that dictates the character of the product. Could restricting the sum to odd numbers, provide such a quality?
*edit* nevermind. I'm out of my league here. I'll just lurk. |
05-09-2003, 02:47 PM | #36 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 9
|
There is a problem using numbers greater than 1 and a sum of less than 100 which does have a single solution.
|
05-09-2003, 03:20 PM | #37 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW 31 52 24W4
Posts: 1,508
|
Quote:
|
|
05-09-2003, 03:26 PM | #38 | |
Moderator - Science Discussions
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Providence, RI, USA
Posts: 9,908
|
Quote:
|
|
05-09-2003, 03:37 PM | #39 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 9
|
OK, here's the whole problem.
Quote:
|
|
05-09-2003, 03:41 PM | #40 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
|
Quote:
For those who want it, look below for a hint on where to proceed (or at least where I proceeded--there could be a better way). Tf you have trouble reading, either hilight the text or just quote my message: (1) From Sam's first statement, you (and, in the same manner, Polly) can figure out all of the possile sums he might have been given. It seems many of you have done this so far. (2) Sam's statement tells us that her product must be even and must have more than one pair of factors (where we neglect the factor pair including the number 2 in all of our calculations). (3) Ok, so now Polly knows all of Sam's possible sums and she knows the product. Her statement tells us (and Sam) that her her product must factorize such that exactly one factor pair sums to one of Sam's allowed sums. If this is the case, then she can uniquely know the two numbers from Sam's information. (4) So now Sam knows something about Polly's factor pairs. Let's say he takes his sum and computes all possible products that Polly could have. From this list he can determine whether any of these products meets criteria (3). Sam will only be able to determine the answer if exactly one of these possible products meets criteria (3). Only one of the allowed sums will satisfy this, thereby allowing Sam to know the numbers as well. It is this that allows us as outside observers to figure out what the numbers are as well. At any rate, both times I solved this (four years ago and last night) I used math to get part way and then wrote a computer program to brute-force it the rest of the way, implementing the filters listed above. I did, however, once witness a professor solve the problem completely on the blackboard, so I know it's possible to do without the aid of a computer. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|