Freethought & Rationalism Archive

monkenstick · 11-28-2002, 01:28 AM

from a link on family.org

<a href="http://www.boundless.org/2002_2003/features/a0000679.html" target="_blank">http://www.boundless.org/2002_2003/features/a0000679.html</a>

not quite as annoying as some of their other articles on evolution

happyboy · 11-28-2002, 04:16 AM

wow. one hundred scientists, eh? i wonder how many of those scientists were creationists to begin with......

happyboy

RufusAtticus · 11-28-2002, 06:27 AM

Wow never heard those arguments before. . . .

Happy Wonderer · 11-28-2002, 12:24 PM

Quote:

<strong>Evolutionists have long believed that parts of us just have no reason to be there � that is, that random evolution has its inefficiencies, including residual organs that don�t do anything and DNA that serves no purpose. In fact, they argued that about 98 percent of our DNA fell into the �junk DNA� category and that the Human Genome Project shouldn�t waste time and money sequencing it. </strong>

ROTFLAMO.

HW

11-28-2002, 01:28 AM	#1
monkenstick Regular Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Australia Posts: 214	from the site I hate the most; from a link on family.org <a href="http://www.boundless.org/2002_2003/features/a0000679.html" target="_blank">http://www.boundless.org/2002_2003/features/a0000679.html</a> not quite as annoying as some of their other articles on evolution

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

11-28-2002, 04:16 AM	#2
happyboy Regular Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: on the border between here and there, WV Posts: 373	wow. one hundred scientists, eh? i wonder how many of those scientists were creationists to begin with...... happyboy

11-28-2002, 06:27 AM	#3
RufusAtticus Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: NCSU Posts: 5,853	Wow never heard those arguments before. . . .

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.