FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-01-2003, 10:40 AM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: WHERE GOD IS NOT!!!!!
Posts: 4,338
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by BDS
[B]A little piece of advice to all: not all Christians are morons. To argue that they are is silly. Further, to argue that
WE atheists can interpret what the Bible REALLY means better than the Christians can is also silly.
We're not saying we can find any meaning in the Bible at all. We're not arguing that all christians are morons.

Quote:
I'm sure intelligent Christians have a perfectly reasonable answer for all of these criticisms, but I don't happen to know what it is.
Don't hold your breath waiting for rational explanations of prayer. You'll get an answer alright, but it won't be rational.
BadBadBad is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 03:23 PM   #42
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 10,056
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by BDS
A little piece of advice to all: not all Christians are morons. To argue that they are is silly. Further, to argue that WE atheists can interpret what the Bible REALLY means better than the Christians can is also silly.
To claim that either argument was actually made in this thread would be even sillier.

I'm sure intelligent Christians have a perfectly reasonable answer for all of these criticisms, but I don't happen to know what it is.

In the absense of a perfectly reasonable answer, why do you assume that it's necessarily perfectly reasonable?

WMD
Wayne Delia is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 06:05 PM   #43
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sarver, PA, USA
Posts: 920
Default

Okay, how about a revised version of the God Test, where religions are only tested according to their claims, and not all religions are given the exact same test?

Shouldn't we still see a statistically significant difference between the priests of a "real" god and "false" gods? Wasn't that the whole point of the episode with Elijah and Baal -- to demonstrate WITH A TEST which god is real?
Wyrdsmyth is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 06:14 PM   #44
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sarver, PA, USA
Posts: 920
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by BDS
A little piece of advice to all: not all Christians are morons. To argue that they are is silly. Further, to argue that
WE atheists can interpret what the Bible REALLY means better than the Christians can is also silly.
I find it odd that you keep emphasizing how you're an atheist, and not a Christian, yet get so defensive and insulted by a thread that is not specifically anti-Christian in the first place. And now you're responding to things we didn't even say: No one said all Christians are morons, or that we atheists can interpret the Bible "better" than Christians can.

Quote:
I'm sure intelligent Christians have a perfectly reasonable answer for all of these criticisms, but I don't happen to know what it is.
Then why did you assume the role of "Christian defender" in the first place? I find these last remarks of yours extremely odd. Let me repeat: No one is specifically attacking Christians -- if anything, the spotlight of skepticism is being aimed at all theism and supernaturalism alike, as a whole.
Wyrdsmyth is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 06:28 PM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,247
Default

Perhaps he is referring to when I said this: "[Prayer is...] A complete waist of time to an intelligent person." But if he takes the position that one cannot change the mind of god or have any influence whatsoever over any desired future outcome by asking god for it, then I can't see how any rational human being could say that praying to god for a desired future outcome (which is already pre-determined) is remotely worth the time of an intelligent person.
Hawkingfan is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 07:06 PM   #46
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by BDS
Further, to argue that WE atheists can interpret what the Bible REALLY means better than the Christians can is also silly.

How so? If the supernatural claims of the Bible do not describe factual events, then Christians who believe those events did happen are wrong, whatever interpretations they take. Thus, the common atheist claim that those parts of the Bible are mythological is going to be much closer to the truth.
Philosoft is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:07 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.