FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-08-2002, 04:50 AM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: somewhere in the known Universe
Posts: 6,993
Post

Talulah,

I would be interested to see that report. I think one of the reasons those around the age of 15 might have a late-term abortion is because they typically don't get pre-natal care, are more likely to have abused drugs and alcohol and because pregnancy is more dangerous to a girl this age then an older female. I would also want to know the specific details of that report. What is "late" by their definition? Furthermore most states have pretty strict regulations regarding late-term abortions so I am a bit skeptical about that statistic.

Brighid
brighid is offline  
Old 11-08-2002, 04:55 AM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Augusta, Maine, USA
Posts: 2,046
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Talulah:
<strong>Why the pictures?

I remember going to the fair as a kid and looking at those kind of pictures plastered everywhere in exhibits. (Incidently, some of those pictures are so familiar I wonder if they aren't THE same ones) We (my brothers and I) were, of course encouraged by our parents to pick up their pamplets and study those horrible pictures.

I think one of the main ideas behind the pictures is for you to think 'Oh, look how much that cute little baby was hurt.'

All people were once cute babies [depending on if you think babies are cute], even the abortionists, who are so 'evil' now. They are content to strike at the most emotionally vulnerable with that tactic, which is devoid of logic.

I do notice also that they don't show pictures where the baby had obvious defects before the abortion, and all of them are developed a good deal. Where are the black babies? Where are their pictures of children whose parents beat them to death. I bet those pictures are heart rending and we KNOW they were tortured.</strong>
The zealotry and dishonesty of this movement is frightening. A full-color enlarged photo of a human zygote, or even an embryo, would probably not elicit the horrified reactions they are looking for. Something that looks like a tadpole with big eyes bugging out of its huge head, a cleft lip, and a tail, just doesn't look enough like a baby to elicit the proper emotions.
babelfish is offline  
Old 11-08-2002, 05:05 AM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: somewhere in the known Universe
Posts: 6,993
Post

I think those people holding up the tired, old signs of late-term abortions should have to visit DCFS or an orphanage with children who have been removed from abusive homes for some comparison. We have been looking to adopt a child and I have spent what can been seen as an inordinate amount of time looking through EVERY states available child listings. I read the stories and I am sickened by what some of these children have had to endure. I want to adopt them all… but that won’t happen. These people should not be so worried about the human potential that will never be, but the human potential that is wasting away in the existing children born into bad familial situations who desperately need loving families to heal their mental, emotional and physical wounds. That is the meaning of “pro-life.” Those pro-life people parading in front of abortion clinics condemning women to hell, screaming vile names at them no nothing about being “pro-life.” They are hateful and vile and cannot see that what they do demeans life and harms the dignity that ones humanity deserves.

If all of these churches would encourage their members to foster or adopt these needy children they would be doing more for life then by damning women to hell for having wombs. My husband has begged me to not visit those sites too often because it depresses me so. How can people be so cruel to their children?

It won’t be until the Pro-Life movement actually takes action toward bettering human life that I will even begin to have an ounce of respect for it. I realize that there are those amongst the movement that are doing good, but they don’t get the attention from their counterparts or the media. It’s sad … truly, truly sad.

Brighid
brighid is offline  
Old 11-08-2002, 05:14 AM   #34
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
Post

Originally posted by brighid:
<strong>These people should not be so worried about the human potential that will never be, but the human potential that is wasting away in the existing children born into bad familial situations ...</strong>

Completely agree. Here are two scenarios I posed to an anti-abortion fanatic once.

Scenario 1 : An abortion is performed. As a result, there is no further pregnancy and no child.

Scenario 2 : No abortion is performed. The child is born into a highly abusive family. He/she is degraded, neglected, beaten and finally killed.

Which scenario is preferable? His answer :

"The second one. At least that way, the child got to live."

Excuse me while I either vomit or cry, or both.
Queen of Swords is offline  
Old 11-08-2002, 05:21 AM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Augusta, Maine, USA
Posts: 2,046
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by simian:
<strong>


Have you paid attention to those looking to re-criminalize abortion? As far as I can see, they do view women, fetuses, and children as male posessions to pretty much do with as they wish. Or, in their words, men and women have different "gifts" - women have thier wombs and the "motherly" attributes it gives - men have the women - the father before marriage, the husband after.</strong>
Here's an article about <a href="http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m2294/1999_May/55844300/p1/article.jhtml" target="_blank">Promise Keepers</a>.


Quote:
Originally posted by simian:
<strong>
But, no, I don't think illegal abortions would be as they were in the past. RU-486 and other chemical (early-term) abortificants would be somewhat available on a blackmarket here. </strong>
I agree. The fact that these drugs are legal in other countries will make the blackmarket availability of them here almost inevitable. And, as was true before Roe v. Wade, people who can afford the price will be able to afford an abortion. And the law will probably target the black-marketeers, not the women who have taken an abortifacient. It's much more effective to just remove the choice from women's unpredictable, murderous hands!

Quote:
Originally posted by simian:
<strong>

I think we would see assisting or having an abortion getting labeled as full-fledged murder, though, complete with the death penalty.

Simian</strong>
This is what I don't think will ever happen. I've listened to Christian women who have gotten abortions speaking openly about their experiences, but never have I heard one take responsibility for committing murder! They always paint themselves as a victim. Someone "talked them into it" or "forced them to" have an abortion. They clearly don't see themselves as having murdered a child. If you killed a newborn, and took responsibility for it, I would think you would expect to do some time!

Clearly, even pro-life Christians differentiate intuitively between abortion and infanticide.
babelfish is offline  
Old 11-08-2002, 08:16 AM   #36
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Beautiful Colorado
Posts: 682
Post

Brighid,


My link two or three posts up from yours was where I got the info about the &lt;15 year olds and later abortions. I agree about what you surmise to be the reason. I would also say that I think that teenagers that young might take longer to know that they are pregnant. Some of them may have not even had regular cycles before they got pregnant.

The other statement that I made about late abortions for health reasons was something I think I remembered but don't have the evidence for.

[ November 08, 2002: Message edited by: Talulah ]</p>
Talulah is offline  
Old 11-08-2002, 08:44 AM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: St. Louis, MO area
Posts: 1,924
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by babelfish:
<strong>

This is what I don't think will ever happen. I've listened to Christian women who have gotten abortions speaking openly about their experiences, but never have I heard one take responsibility for committing murder! They always paint themselves as a victim. Someone "talked them into it" or "forced them to" have an abortion. They clearly don't see themselves as having murdered a child. If you killed a newborn, and took responsibility for it, I would think you would expect to do some time!

Clearly, even pro-life Christians differentiate intuitively between abortion and infanticide.</strong>
As far as I can see, the vast majority of the anti-choice Christian argument is that abortion IS murder. If it is not murder, then why be concerned? (This is, of course, ignoring the portion that feels ANY birth control is disobeying the will of their god) Then, of course, there is my experience with the general anti-choice crowd who will openly state that "abortion is murder." Please see:
<a href="http://www.covenantnews.com/murder.htm" target="_blank">here</a>, <a href="http://www.ark-of-salvation.org/abortion.htm" target="_blank">here</a>, <a href="http://www.abortionismurder.org/" target="_blank">here</a>, <a href="http://www.submission.org/abortion.html" target="_blank">here</a>, and <a href="http://www.silentscream.org/" target="_blank">here</a>.

Note: the front page of "Silent Scream" doesn't state (that I could find) directly that "abortion is murder," but this seems to be the idea of the site. Somebody familiar with "Silent Scream" should comment on how truthful the presentation is.

The comments you listed above seem to be placing the blame somewhere besides themselves. That doesn't mean they feel it is less than murder, just that they are not the "true" guilty party. "I'm not responsible, it was my ex-boyfriend that made me do it." "I was taken in by the lies of Planned Parenthood."

Simian

Edited because I am an idiot and hit the add reply button instead of the URL button.

[ November 08, 2002: Message edited by: simian ]</p>
simian is offline  
Old 11-08-2002, 09:01 AM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Augusta, Maine, USA
Posts: 2,046
Post

You may have a point there, simian.

If you blame the abortion on your boyfriend or your parents or even society, then you absolve yourself of any guilt and really do become the victim even in your own mind.

Still, I don't like to imagine a time when a desperate woman could be dragged off to jail because she's taken RU486 and her miscarriage was really an abortion!

It's horrifying.
babelfish is offline  
Old 11-10-2002, 06:15 PM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by QueenofSwords:
<strong>Originally posted by brighid:
[qb]These people should not be so worried about the human potential that will never be, but the human potential that is wasting away in the existing children born into bad familial situations ...</strong>

Completely agree. Here are two scenarios I posed to an anti-abortion fanatic once.

Scenario 1 : An abortion is performed. As a result, there is no further pregnancy and no child.

Scenario 2 : No abortion is performed. The child is born into a highly abusive family. He/she is degraded, neglected, beaten and finally killed.

Which scenario is preferable? His answer :

"The second one. At least that way, the child got to live."

Excuse me while I either vomit or cry, or both.[/QB]
That pro-lifer is really sick, IMO. They ALWAYS believe that a bad life is better than none at all. They care nothing for the quality, only of the QUANTITY of life. They would keep people alive for 200 years if they were allowed too much government power.
winstonjen is offline  
Old 11-11-2002, 04:09 AM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: somewhere in the known Universe
Posts: 6,993
Post

Thanks Talulah! Sorry I haven't responded sooner, but ... well describing this last week as busy would be an understatement!

WOW - I don't remember the details of those stats ... and unfortunately I don't have any of that stuff bookmarked anymore ....

Brighid
brighid is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:26 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.