Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-29-2003, 04:00 AM | #61 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ...
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
I recall Aisha's quote for him when "allah" "revealed" a verse stating that its ok for muslim women to "give" themselves for the prophet for marriage, she said "I see Allah quickly granting you your desires" . that quote speaks volumes about this 'relevation'..doesn't it? |
|
06-29-2003, 04:40 AM | #62 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Selva Oscura
Posts: 4,120
|
Quote:
|
|
06-29-2003, 04:54 AM | #63 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 183
|
Thanks, looks interesting so far.
|
06-29-2003, 05:14 AM | #64 | |||
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ...
Posts: 34
|
whoa!
hi sphinx.
wh are you so angry? relax my friend.... Quote:
- I live a secular life without any interference of religion. - I do not fast in ramadan..duh. - I do not give a damn about the islamic traditions you mentioned. - I view the ancient islamic cairo and old mosques as monuments..nothing more...just like the pharaonic and Coptic monuments . I don't see how does all that puts me in the term you invented, "a muslim cultrally" . Quote:
Quote:
bye. |
|||
06-29-2003, 09:26 AM | #65 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
|
-hinduwoman
---Do you know that there are thousands of Hadiths? Do you know that there exists a scholarly field called " Science of Hadiths' which carefully traces back to the source of transmission , validity and reliability of the author as well , the manner in which it was repeated? This is not an area that is even debated by Orientalists. " Science of Hadiths" is real. So now that you know that a " system of narration" exist....ask yourself ...Is the piece I just presented legit? Do you know Hadiths were made by thousands of individuals? Do you know that no Muslim considers Hadiths the words of G-d? ---Why are you always so antagonistic to Islam? Just out of curiosity, are you from Hinduvta? "Rivers" |
06-29-2003, 09:30 AM | #66 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
|
Quote:
|
|
06-29-2003, 09:37 AM | #67 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
|
Quote:
I am not sure why you are asking sphinx any questions if you are not doing it out of sincerity. As can be seen from your statement : "Glad I'm a Christian. My husband and I believe in what our Bible tells us. .......this type of attitude or mindset will keep you closed from ever understanding Islam from the perspective that Muslims see it. |
|
06-29-2003, 12:32 PM | #68 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: here
Posts: 121
|
Whats wrong with whores?
|
06-29-2003, 01:07 PM | #69 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tampa Bay area
Posts: 3,471
|
We are all whores in some way or another if given the loose definition of whore that Sphinx uses.
Language can end up so loosely defined that it has no real meaning at all. And that is true in this case. |
06-29-2003, 06:40 PM | #70 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: India
Posts: 6,977
|
Rivers,
all the quotes I use are from the four sahi Hadiths, which as you know are considered to be sound. Sure the hadis are not the words of Allah, but they are sunnah and form the basis of Shariah, do they not? Shariah has many outdated laws which are justified by the Hadiths. I am not from Hindutva as such, but it does not take Hindutva to make a Hindu distrustful of Islam. Our history is littered with massacres and oppression by Islamic authorities in the name of their faith. Don't bother saying, they were not real muslims, they were following the dictates of Koran regarding treatment of polytheists and the conquerers gloated over their success over infidels. Today we find many Indian muslims unwilling to change and hating hinduism deeply for no other reason than that it is not Islam. Won't say that Hindus are angels, but one cannot be at peace with people whose first principle is "I shall not tolerate you". As for relgious texts, I am afraid that Hindu vision of them differe from Semitic one. Frankly sacred texts are a non-issue. Hinduism is not a revealed religion: result we have oodles of sacred texts, each of which is as valid as the others even if they contradict each other. Since Hindu tradition was largely oral people happily went on making changes to them. Ramayana for example has 350 versions approximately and people following one of them regards it as true as other versions. There is no immutable Divine Word in Hinduism though some would like to claim the Vedas as such. But then there are many groups within Hinduism which do not regard Vedas as supreme texts. "Let a thousand srutis tell you that fire is cold; it will not be true" --- Adi Shankara. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|