FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

View Poll Results: Can the GOP Senate elect even ONE non-Bigot as leader?!
Yes 12 30.00%
No 28 70.00%
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-22-2003, 07:10 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 1,827
Default Santorum: Typical GOP BIgot Senator or "Outlier"?

Can the GOP senators select even ONE person from their membership who isn't an ignorant bigot to lead them?!

If so, who is it likely to be?

Please see CNN on the subject.
Feather is offline  
Old 04-22-2003, 07:31 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 2,846
Default

"If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual (gay) sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything,"

He's right, though. All of those should be outside of govermental authority.
Majestyk is offline  
Old 04-22-2003, 07:34 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 1,827
Default

Can't say I disagree with you.

However, he was (obviously, I think) equating the act of homosexuality with the others on the same level of (im)morality. That is, he was condemning gays as immoral, promiscuous sluts (i.e. the usual).
Feather is offline  
Old 04-22-2003, 08:17 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 9,747
Default

Santorum is one of the biggest fundie jackasses in the Senate. He was responsible for the infamous "Santorum Amendment" of the "No Child Left Behind [sic]" bill. It was written by Philip Johnson, and though the wording of the amendment is non-controversial, the creationists constantly cite it as meaning that Federal Law now mandates their nonsense to be taught. It never actually got into the final version of the bill, but is part of the conference language; that doesn't stop the dishonest creos from saying that it's law though.

Dear people of Pennsylvania: Please get rid of Santorum.

theyeti
theyeti is offline  
Old 04-22-2003, 08:50 AM   #5
Jat
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,311
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Feather
Can't say I disagree with you.

However, he was (obviously, I think) equating the act of homosexuality with the others on the same level of (im)morality. That is, he was condemning gays as immoral, promiscuous sluts (i.e. the usual).
But than again they think that ANY form of sexual behavior is immoral, unless it is for reproduction only. In other words, if it feels good than it is immoral.
Jat is offline  
Old 04-22-2003, 09:53 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Spudtopia, ID
Posts: 5,315
Default

I know that it may seem like all the Republicans are whacky fundy biggots but there are a few exceptions.

Lincoln Chafee of RI
Olympia Snowe of ME
Arlen Specter of PA

I know of a Log Cabin Republican in AZ but I can't recall his name.

Honestly though I cannot understand why these honorble people would choose to associate with this party especially considering that fianacial policy between the parties has become so homogenous.
ex-idaho is offline  
Old 04-22-2003, 10:07 AM   #7
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Void
Posts: 396
Default

Ron Paul (R-TX)
Melkor is offline  
Old 04-22-2003, 10:08 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Spudtopia, ID
Posts: 5,315
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Melkor
Ron Paul (R-TX)
Didn't he create a big stink about school prayer in the last campaign cycle?
ex-idaho is offline  
Old 04-22-2003, 10:12 AM   #9
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: England
Posts: 2,608
Default

Quote:
Location: USA
Posts: 287

"If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual (gay) sex within your home,
No one rights are infringed if two men (or two women) have sex.


Quote:
then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy,
How does he think bigamy is intrinsically inferior to monogamy? Only Christian ethics would state that it is.


Quote:
you have the right to incest,
Again, no one's rights are infringed.
Quote:
you have the right to adultery.
Cheating may emotionally harm people, nevertheless that's the primary negative aspect.
Quote:
You have the right to anything,"
Well if a person commits acts that contrevene society's 'moral fibre', so what? What of it?
meritocrat is offline  
Old 04-22-2003, 10:44 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 3,733
Default

Lincoln Chafee of RI
Olympia Snowe of ME
Arlen Specter of PA


None of whom has the slightest chance of being elected a Republican leader inthe foreseeable future.

I know of a Log Cabin Republican in AZ but I can't recall his name.

Do you mean Rep. Jim Kolbe?

Mark
MarkW is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:08 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.