FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-04-2003, 05:28 AM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 183
Default Envious of a bully?

Many commentators and politicians whilst speaking critically of American military policy, or of the Bush administration in particular, often seem to feel the need to also say something like "...but there are a lot of good things about the United States". But they never say what those good things are.

After 911 Bush said something along the lines of US being attacked by people envious of freedom, suggesting that America had some particular kind of freedom that would arouse psychotic hatred. Or if not the supposed hatred of psychotics then the cool, calm, deliberate actions of evildoers. So which is it? Are the attackers crazy or evil? And if they are evil do thay have supernatural powers?

Hate to be a bore, but still no-one has seriously questioned why military jets were not in the air at least before the hi-jacked jet destined to hit the second WTC tower struck. Over an hour had elapsed since it was known that passenger jets had been hi-jacked. And their movements were being tracked on radar.

Anyway... why would anyone want to attack America? Do they object to your spectacular sunsets?
RoddyM is offline  
Old 03-04-2003, 11:53 AM   #2
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default Re: Envious of a bully?

Quote:
Originally posted by RoddyM
Hate to be a bore, but still no-one has seriously questioned why military jets were not in the air at least before the hi-jacked jet destined to hit the second WTC tower struck. Over an hour had elapsed since it was known that passenger jets had been hi-jacked. And their movements were being tracked on radar.
Because until the first tower was hit it didn't sink in to anyone that this wasn't a normal, albeit big, hijacking.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old 03-04-2003, 12:01 PM   #3
Zar
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Chicago, IL USA
Posts: 3,477
Default

On the 9/11 thing, it looks like we're starting from square one on this issue again, judging by the OP and Loren's predictable response. Let's try the old arguments again and see if they stick this time, eh?

Anyway, hasn't this been covered at length in other threads, like this one? Maybe you can read through that and comment further if the spirit moves you.
Zar is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:58 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.