FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-22-2002, 01:47 PM   #11
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Henrietta:
<strong>The Catholics I have known have the good sense to ignore just about everything the pope says. The church will have to do something about the priest shortage if it wants to survive.</strong>
I don't think Catholics know what the Vatican teaches and they really don't need to. Tradition is what counts and if using contraception means sin then sin it will be. And why not? -- if the cross of eternal salvation is for sinners only it would be a good thing to use contraception (I add this just to show the other side of sin).

Is it perhaps true that sin-torn protestants know more about Catholic doctrine then Catholics themselves?
 
Old 01-22-2002, 01:49 PM   #12
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by crazyfingers:
<strong>

Sort of like a secular Jew. Jewish for the cultural part but not the god part.</strong>
Judiasm and Catholicism are mystery religions in which God cannot be studied but must be revealed to the believer. Down with the "School of Divin-ity." What a paradox and proof of ignorance!
 
Old 01-22-2002, 01:53 PM   #13
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Trobert the Church understands that you are a victim of cicumstances. You did not create yourself but from their point of view to condone it is to enculture it and so increase the occurances. Have you ever wondered why traditionally the oldest child of each family was to become either a priest of a nun? (don't ask me for an answer here).

[ January 22, 2002: Message edited by: Amos ]</p>
 
Old 01-22-2002, 03:22 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 1,392
Post

I think James Carroll would have a stroke if he read anything that Amos writes about what catholicism is.
I think Carroll is a guy who could become an agnostic but is attracted to the church and wants to reform it. He is a dreamer, I say. He is an aging 1960's radical type who just can't give up his dreams.
Hang it up, James, and besides if this was the 16th century that editorial would have got you a well done stake. Burn baby burn.
sullster is offline  
Old 01-22-2002, 04:21 PM   #15
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 51
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Amos:
<strong> Have you ever wondered why traditionally the oldest child of each family was to become either a priest of a nun? (don't ask me for an answer here).

[ January 22, 2002: Message edited by: Amos ]</strong>
In today's Military History class, we just talked about this "tradition" -- according to the teacher, it was actually the _second_ son who traditionally entered the church. The first would inherit the estate and run the family business, and the the third would enter the military, usually cavalry if he's upper class. Sons thereafter would kind of alternate between church and military.
Max Bane is offline  
Old 01-22-2002, 04:41 PM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: West USA
Posts: 380
Post

Throbert I do understand that. And if your experiences were sort of comfortable I can see that and have heard it before. I don't agree that all Jews have is the religion. It's an ethnic and cultural group. Orpheous have you ever know any secular jews? I think most jews in US are non-religious. That's my impression anyway.
Henrietta is offline  
Old 01-22-2002, 06:08 PM   #17
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by sullster:
<strong>I think James Carroll would have a stroke if he read anything that Amos writes about what catholicism is. </strong>
Carroll doesn't understand sullster and sounds more like a protestant reformer than a Catholic --which makes him a-gnostic already.

You are right that the things I write here do not belong on a Catholic board and are never allowed on a protestant board.
 
Old 01-22-2002, 06:14 PM   #18
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Max Bane:
<strong>

In today's Military History class, we just talked about this "tradition" -- according to the teacher, it was actually the _second_ son who traditionally entered the church. The first would inherit the estate and run the family business, and the the third would enter the military, usually cavalry if he's upper class. Sons thereafter would kind of alternate between church and military.</strong>
Max I think I know that it was the oldest, either girl or boy, and the estate often did not exist.
 
Old 01-22-2002, 06:45 PM   #19
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want
Posts: 4,871
Angry

Another perfectly good post hijacked by Amos' bullshit.
GunnerJ is offline  
Old 01-22-2002, 06:50 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 759
Post

i like Amos's bullshit - seriously. He is interesting and entertaining, if not always clear...(understatement!)

And I think he did address your post. Of course, it got a little sidetracked but threads usually do, after all.

With regard to your original post, I used to be virilently anti Catholic in my rhetoric. Now I think that the fundamentalist Protestants are the real threat to athiesm, science, progress, et cetera.

Catholicism is at least liberal in its application if not in doctrine...
David Gould is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:24 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.