Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-24-2003, 08:05 AM | #11 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sandpoint, ID
Posts: 363
|
See also approx. a third of the way into the article at www.televar.com/~jnj/item8.htm for further insight on this subject.
|
03-24-2003, 04:54 PM | #12 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 26
|
Hi all,
You may find this interesting....... http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/94/12/6291 Quote:
Well, there you have it. Let's not beat about the bush, creationists have been caught lying again. The dino blood is nothing more than fossil bone that is consistent with heam groups left behind by blood. Interesting, but not a single blood cell was recovered. Mark |
|
03-24-2003, 05:05 PM | #13 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
From the second site in the OP:
However, when the dinosaur bone has been prevented from being invaded by mineral-rich water, one would expect that over ‘millions of years’, even locked away from all bacterial agents, dinosaur bone would, in obeying the laws of thermodynamics, just disintegrate from the random motions of the molecules therein. Huh? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|