Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-30-2002, 06:37 PM | #51 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
|
Quote:
2) It does not follow from the existence of instant T=0 that there was a change prior to T=0 that triggered time itself to start existing. Time may simply exist, with absolutely nothing before T=0. 3) While your argument has already fallen apart, I may as well address this point too. Our space-time universe could have a cause without that cause existing in time, but that would require us to propose the existence of higher levels of some sort. Finally, what would be wrong with time being infinite? As far as I can tell, absolutely nothing. |
|
07-30-2002, 11:49 PM | #52 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Sahara
Posts: 216
|
hey tronvillain.........
3)Our space-time universe could have a cause without that cause existing in time, Why are you letting go our notion of cause and effect.if the universe could not have needed time to start to exist, then why even start thinking that "TIME" exists. I will echo my words again "TIME is A Creation Of Our Brains".An illusion! but that would require us to propose the existence of higher levels of some sort. Thats where man always flees to when he can't explain something. 'a state of highest order'. Finally, what would be wrong with time being infinite? As far as I can tell, absolutely nothing. We all know that infinity is another illusion just as 'time' is! It's like proposing again "existence of higher levels of some sort. as you put it ealier. I know that time to us, is an ordering of causality, that it is very difficult to let it go. Just as most people find it so odd to abandon the idea of a "God"., because he/she looks so real to them, that even their brains have developed a sort of an extra "dimension" to represent a him 'God'. I also know that until we can unite the four fundamental forces in our universe into one unified theory, and until we understand how gravity behaves at extremely small scales,'time' will be hard to do away with.... Until then you keep the idea of a 'time' existing and i keep the idea that 'TIME DOES NOT EXIST!!!!' --Thanks--- |
07-31-2002, 04:18 AM | #53 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
|
Quote:
|
|
07-31-2002, 05:08 AM | #54 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,886
|
Quote:
|
|
08-01-2002, 05:14 AM | #55 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montrčal
Posts: 367
|
good work so far,
Time is what is experienced while waiting for the changes to complete. In a still universe one waits for the stillness to end. Sammi Na Boodie () |
08-01-2002, 05:33 AM | #56 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Sahara
Posts: 216
|
Originally posted by Mr. Sammi:
Time is what is experienced while waiting for the changes to complete. A change will complete with or without waiting. Time is what is experienced Do i sense; "God is what is experienced" here Does an embryo in the womb 'experience' "time"? Mr.Sammi, We DONT EXPERIENCE TIME BECAUSE IT DOES NOT EXIST. |
08-01-2002, 12:14 PM | #57 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 1,336
|
Greetings:
Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana. --Groucho Marx. (Thought a little levity was in order.) Keith. |
08-03-2002, 01:44 AM | #58 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Sahara
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
|
|
08-03-2002, 05:44 AM | #59 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
|
Quote:
|
|
08-03-2002, 06:01 AM | #60 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Sahara
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
The future is there somewhere in the universe,not somewhere in 'tim'e [ August 03, 2002: Message edited by: Black Moses ]</p> |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|