FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-17-2003, 12:42 PM   #71
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tewksbury, Mass., USA
Posts: 170
Exclamation English Language 101- Atheism doesn't require faith!

Greetings ArvelJoffi,

You are having trouble accepting that atheism rquires no faith, because you have bought into the traditional {and incorrect} definition of the word {i.e, a positive statement about the nonexistence of God}.

This is simply not the case.

Theism means, as I understand it, the belief in a divinity/god/higher power. Add the prefix a, and you get a lack of belief in said divinity/god/higher power.

I, as an atheist, do not make the statement "I deny the existence of God". Perhaps that makes me a weak atheist, but I prefer the term "atheistic agnostic" used by George Smith in Atheism: The case against God.

I simply say that I see absolutely no evidence for any kind of god, any more than I see evidence for little green men, fairies, ghosts, ect. I don't believe in any of them, nor do I claim absolute certainty of their nonexistence.

Please, ArvelJoffi, please show me one part of this statement that meets any of the requirements for faith.

Go ahead, I'll wait....

*crickets*

Didn't think so.

I hearby pronounce this debate over.

HQB

{editud cuz sumtimz eye kant nott evun spel so gude}
THE_LEGENDARY_HQB is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 12:56 PM   #72
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Infinity Lover
No, they only need to recognize theism; the god-belief. God and god-belief are not the same... just like thirst and beverage aren't the same either. Or perhaps message and source would be a better analogy.


The God belief of theists is just their description of this uknown element that prevails in everybodies life. God is the unknown and the atheist belief is a description of it. If it is right or wrong is not important here but before atheist can call it wrong they must first identify it and then call it wrong.

The unknown element exists because we have the potential to become God and after that God no longer exists (because we now have comprehended God and know who we are).
 
Old 01-17-2003, 01:02 PM   #73
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tewksbury, Mass., USA
Posts: 170
Default

Originally posted by Amos:
"The God belief of theists is just their description of this uknown element that prevails in everybodies life. God is the unknown and the atheist belief is a description of it. If it is right or wrong is not important here but before atheist can call it wrong they must first identify it and then call it wrong.

The unknown element exists because we have the potential to become God and after that God no longer exists (because we now have comprehended God and know who we are)."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amos, I'd ask you to explain this, but I'm deathly afraid you'd answer me.

HQB
THE_LEGENDARY_HQB is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 01:41 PM   #74
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 5,047
Arrow

~ Verily.

:notworthy
Ronin is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 01:51 PM   #75
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by THE_LEGENDARY_HQB
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amos, I'd ask you to explain this, but I'm deathly afraid you'd answer me.

HQB
It's called "enlightenment" in many Eastern religions and here in the West it is called "God" by theists and "no-God" by atheist.
 
Old 01-17-2003, 02:04 PM   #76
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Amos
It's called "enlightenment" in many Eastern religions and here in the West it is called "God" by theists and "no-God" by atheist.
"No-god" isn't a thing.
hezekiah jones is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 02:04 PM   #77
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,359
Default

HQB,

I've already stated that my original post didn't clearly state what I had in mind with this thread. In subsequent posts, I think I made myself very clear. I guess you could say I was asking questions about the anti-theists that pop up occasionally, here and elsewhere.

Your statement, in particular, I won't refute. Like I said - and I'll say it again - and like you stated, not believing in something is markedly different than believing firmly that something does not exist.

Most atheists are, quite simply, people with no use for a diety, or anything even remotely in the same philosophical realm. Some atheists hold their views that nothing supernatural exists beyond all reason and scientific proof.

I will now apologize again for choosing my words poorly at the beginning of the thread. I will now also state that I have clarified myself and am weary of reading responses to the original post. Henceforth, I will only bash Abrahamic religions and the twisted cultures and ideals attached to them, and we will all get along swimmingly. Thank you!
Arvel Joffi is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 02:27 PM   #78
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,047
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Amos
It's called "enlightenment" in many Eastern religions and here in the West it is called "God" by theists and "no-God" by atheist.
I think most atheists would refer to it as taking your head out of your ass. You should try it sometimes, it's very enlightening.
Infinity Lover is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 02:30 PM   #79
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,359
Default

Ouch.

hehe
Arvel Joffi is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 03:27 PM   #80
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: U.S.
Posts: 4,171
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Amos
That's a good idea but must atheists not recognize that which theists call God before they can deny it?

I have no objection to atheistm rejecting the fancy footsteps of religious perversion but the concept that we call God must be acknowledged before it can be denied. Let's just say that atheist reject religion and its avenue towards enlightenment because they see too many religious people succumb to the slavery of their perversion. Moreover, especially since religion is puported to bring freedom it is obvious that just the opposite is true and that is a good enough reason for me.
Why "must" an atheist do any of these things?

DC
Rusting Car Bumper is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:09 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.