Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-07-2003, 04:36 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: hobart,tasmania
Posts: 551
|
soul
Read the article above.I was pleased I hadn't imagined the experiment.
|
05-07-2003, 06:16 AM | #12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: the impenetrable fortress of the bubbleheads
Posts: 1,308
|
Wouldn't tension provide some weight? Blood pressure, air in the lungs, constricted muscles.
|
05-07-2003, 07:06 AM | #13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
|
Well, the OP had the soul weighing 4 ounces, Blackmore's quote had a one ounce soul early in the twentieth century that lost weight as measurement got better, and the tabloid article linked above, has the soul weighing 1/3,000 of 1 ounce. That's probably less than the weight of water in a single exhalation.
We've known for a long time that there has been a spiritual decline around the world. Now there is scientific proof. We've lost at least 2999/3000 of our souls, in a single century! That's so depressing. Patrick |
05-07-2003, 09:01 AM | #14 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: El Paso Tx
Posts: 66
|
Thank you. Had this little "gem" of information come from anyone but him I wouldn't have ever thought twice about it. In fact I barely did. The guy is a philosophy teacher and one of the most intelligent people I know. He even told me the university that conducted the experiment. I'll remember to call the BS card on him the next time we talk.
|
05-07-2003, 09:16 AM | #15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW 31 52 24W4
Posts: 1,508
|
Quote:
As for air in the lungs, the density of air is about 1 kg per cubic metre, or one gram per litre. I can't imagine anyone's lung capacity being much more than 8 litres (about 2 US gallons). Such a person could lose as much as 8 grams (a little over a quarter ounce) with each breath. |
|
05-07-2003, 09:46 AM | #16 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: El Paso Tx
Posts: 66
|
Well that isn't really relavent because no one has show that an experiment like this has actually been conducted.
|
05-07-2003, 01:17 PM | #17 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 417
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|