Volker.Doormann

But this is the point. The private personal view has no meaning in science. A personal disbelieve is as irrelevant as a believe, also, if this is a belief in science, skepticism or nothing.

It seems, that no one here does recognize a correlation between both, the statements given by the test person #3 in contrast to the given astrological analyses of its birth dates, or even a correlation, which may significant. If so, I think it should be easy to workout a professional evaluation that proves this result by the work of science and scientific methods. I think it would be helpful if anyone here comes up with a scientific professional work evaluating this. If skeptic is not only ignorance, then skeptics can show by scientific methods, that these astrological interpretations are without any meaning. It is obvious, that this evaluation examine each single used astrologic/psychological relation as known expert knowledge in astrology, to be quit sure that rational astronomical facts and its known astrological meaning were taken, because this logic is essential, as it gives proof of a reasonable understandable relations.

Volker

Relative Newcomer

For those interested, +/-23 days and counting...

Arken

Don't bother. On that date, there will be SOME sort of disaster as there is a disaster virtually every day of the year and so Volker will claim victory. It won't matter that the disaster was not as colossal as he implied... just one fire or minor quake will do.

Autonemesis

What about me? I have practiced it. I have learned how to cast a horoscope. I have shown people their charts and given them my interpretation, and they have said that it pertained to them, and was helpful. I also know how to do Tarot. Same thing.

And yet it is all bunk. I know from personal experience. I know how to "do" astrology. I have done it. It's pure fantasy. I've even directly told people I just gave an interpretation to that it's all fantasy. They choose instead to believe that I am the unwitting channeller of unknown powers.

Volker.Doormann

It is of no scientific relevance, if one knows from personal experience. Neither if one knows about experience, which is rated as bunk, nor if one knows about experience rated as evident, because there is in none of both cases a scientific reference. You can tell your grandmother, Mr. Randi, the people in IIDB about your experience, but it is as scientifically worthless, as a knowing from a personal experience about Mother Mary. Science needs more then statements about personal experience.

If you skeptic about this, ask Skeptics.

Volker

Volker.Doormann

It is true, that the stress starts in mid of August, but it seems, that this is enhanced +- 2 days to the 'due date' cura.free.fr/xv/13brianj.html.

Volker

Volker.Doormann

It seems, that you take your knowlede out of fantasy. I look at the planetary configuration. In January 2001 there was a high chance on the 26th of January for an earthquake at 03:15 UT, because at this time an index calculated from the planetary configuration for each 5 minutes was maximum.
.
And it was.

Volker

Autonemesis

Wonderful. Thanks for clearing that up. I now leave the scientists in this thread to rip astrology a new asshole, and don't you come back with any anecdotes to refute them, as you have tried to do before. You just agreed that personal experience - anecdotes - are scientifically useless. And I agree. Thanks for allowing me to establish that point.

Autonemesis

Elucidate a mechanism for this action-at-a-distance and you may be onto something. Until you can propose a mechanism, there is no reason to believe that this is not coincidence.

Volker.Doormann

Why have you posted then your experience?