FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-05-2003, 06:32 AM   #61
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tampa Bay area
Posts: 3,471
Default

I like having Magus on this forum.

And I think he only rarely loses his temper. Although we are on opposite ends of the Christian spectrum, he does make me think about what I believe in and what I don't and why. Who knows?, he may actually convert me into a Fundie someday-------(although I find that as unlikely as you all converting me into an atheist.)


I think Magus also challenges the non-theists on this forum to better define their philosophy (started to write belief system, but decided better not get into that one).

Which reminds me------how do atheists like to have their thinking described? I would really not like to offend if not necessary. Does "philosophy" or metaphysics work OK?

Or is there some other term you would like used? Just tell me and I will use it.

I think people should be called what they want to be called and their thinking described in terms they agree with. Just out of politeness if nothing else. Being polite does not stop anyone from discussing the issues of any debate.
Rational BAC is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 09:00 AM   #62
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 1,671
Default

RatBAC, I'm glad you're not a fundy. Some would fault you for being a cherry-picking Christian, but the only way to get any rational non-contradictory scripture out of the bible is to throw out vast quantities of evil, mean, judgmental stuff and stick with stuff like

The Sermon on the Mount,

Whatsoever things are true,.......Think on these things,

Faith hope, and charity: The greatest of these is Love--I Corinthians 13,

Do Justice, Love Mercy and Walk Humbly with thy God (I've seen that one on the wall at the front of a synagogue in Galveston),

Let justice flow like waters and rigtheousness like a mighty stream. (Thsi one is on a black granite water wall at the Southern Poverty Law Center memorial to the victims of racial violence)

The Heavens are telling the glory of God

Let us now praise famous men,

Leviticus: I set before you Life and Death; choose life so that thy and thy seed may live (used by Carl Sagan in the TV series "Cosmos");

They shall beat their swords into plowshares...

Many of the Psalms and Proverbs.

You know this stuff far better than I do.
Besides, if you extract the good kind stuff you would not drive yourself nuts trying to believe in a kind merciful God and a psychotic, capricious, mass-murdering God at the same time.

As far as atheist/agnostic labels I won't speak for anyone else. Some people like humanist, secular humanist, even Unitarian Universalist for those who identify with that denomination. Unitarian=One God; Universalism=Universal salvation for everyone, not just the Elect.

I would say that secular humanism is not hoping for a heaven in the next world, but working in the here and now to help other people and animals, to relieve suffering, feed the hungry, heal the sick, help bring justice into the world, and all that activist stuff.

Speaking for skeptics: Since we have NO actual confirmation that there is an afterlife or a heaven, and all we are sure about is that we are here and now, that we should be working to relieve suffering around us, not praying for a Heaven that we don't know exists. Secular humanism believes in the ability of people to better themselves and to help others.

Quote from famous atheist "Hands that help are far better than lips that Pray". Robert G. Ingersoll.

There are many secular Jews who feel that humanism is a part of their philosophy.

From a description of Jews Without Judaism, Conversations with an Unconventional Rabbi, by Daniel Friedman:

QUOTE: Friedman consistently advocates a secular approach, denying the existence of an omnipotent God. The autonomous individual, rather than God, is foremost in his view. He insists that "religion plays virtually no part in the lives of most American Jews," even claiming that "Judaism, the religion, came to an end some two hundred years ago." Friedman notes that Jewish culture, history, traditions and holidays should be studied and appreciated from a naturalistic perspective. Although few Jews will agree with Friedman's opinions, he succeeds in clearly and persuasively presenting the attitudes of Jewish humanism. UNQUOTE

Secular humanism, or humanism, is an outgrowth of the Enlightment which happened in Europe int he 1700s. The inalienable rights of the individual human to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as embodied in the American Declaration of Independence are what our system is based on.

Before humanism came along, you stayed in the class you were born into. If you were a slave, you stayed there. Kings and queens ruled by Divine Right -- God had given them their power over the people.

So the rights of the individual person, the person being the societal unit and not the divine right of kings to control the underlings was quite radical.

Ben Franklin sailed to London when he was quite young and sat in the coffeehouses where these ideas (from John Locke, Jean Jacques Rousseau, Adam Smith, etc.) were hotly debated. He came back to America very stimulated and the Founding Fathers used them in the Declaration of Independence.

(sorry for the history lesson but I saw the stuff about Jefferson and Franklin yesterday on Public Television. They were running all of the Ken Burns series about the revolutionary war times.)
Opera Nut is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 09:13 AM   #63
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Wayne P
This is just too funny, almost identical posts from both yguy and Magus. And guess what? Nasty atheists are to blame for all their ill will and bad humor!
When did I cast any aspersions on atheists?

Quote:
They came in here, to an (gasp!) atheist discussion board, threw around all their peace and love and were turned into mean, tho vigilant, warriors for their beliefs.
You have no idea what the hell you're talking about. I came to this board locked and loaded, reasonably expecting that some here would hold me in contempt - and I haven't been disappointed. Never once have I blamed anyone else here for any emotional outbursts I may have had...but you are more than welcome to search my posts in a vain attempt to prove otherwise.

Quote:
yguy

I've had plenty of venomous contempt - veiled or otherwise - directed at me without responding in kind.


You'll notice in both their letters they lump me with all the other atheist. I've posted here only three or four times but already they BOTH know exactly what I think and what my intentions are. All of their responses have tarred me with the same broad brush that they tar all their perceived enemies.
You don't read very well, do you?

Quote:
One would have to ask the obvious question, which I know won't get answered, why are you both here?
I have answered it. If you find the answer unsatisfactory, that's your problem.

Quote:
Why subject yourselfs to the ridicule, mockery, and insults. Not to mention the 'venomous contempt -veiled or otherwise'. I've read the archives, you both came in here with chips on your shoulders, which have only gotten bigger since you been here.
Speaking for myself, you can only expect me to get more offensive to people like you - so perhaps you'd better put me on ignore. Now.

Quote:
I mean don't you have more productive things to do than hang around an atheist board and pick fights? If things are so awfull here, why do you stay?
When have I ever said things are awful here?

Quote:
Oh, and one last thing. It's pretty obvious why you both are held in contempt , ridiculed, insulted and mocked on this board, I just can't figure out why you both come back for more! Is this some kind of internet flagellation for you both?
If any of you guys (you know who you are) think your head games have the slightest effect on me, you are laboring under a delusion which will enable me to affect you through your very desire to affect me.
yguy is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 12:29 PM   #64
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 184
Default

Magus: You're not Jewish. You worship Jesus. Don't act like it if your not, {flame deleted} peer pressure ever known to man. Take my advice, because I was born Jewish.
//riot of disorder:: is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 12:37 PM   #65
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 184
Default

Oh, and JESUS WASN'T THE MESSIAH. HE WAS SUPPOSED TO KILL THE ROMANS.
//riot of disorder:: is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 03:03 PM   #66
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Rational BAC
Magus considers himself to be a 1st century Jew. From what I can tell that is exactly what he is.
I would have to agree. Based on the repeated demonstration of his logic and science, he is most definitely thinking like a 1st century Jew.
Kosh is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 07:04 PM   #67
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Great Northeast
Posts: 58
Default Thanks yguy

I wrote:

Quote:
I've read the archives, you both came in here with chips on your shoulders, which have only gotten bigger since you been here.
yguy wrote back:

Quote:
I came to this board locked and loaded, reasonably expecting that some here would hold me in contempt - and I haven't been disappointed
Thanks for making one of my points for me. You came in looking for trouble, ie with a chip on your shoulder.

I'm certainly happy that you haven't been disappointed in your stay here.
Wayne P is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 07:54 PM   #68
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Great Northeast
Posts: 58
Default Rational BAC

Hi Rational BAC,

In spite of what some people have assumed, I really have come here to find out what other members think and what they believe in. Our beliefs, hopes and ideas are such important parts of our lives that we should be happy to discuss them with others. Not only for the pure pleasure of associating with our fellow man/woman but, especially, in the hope of finding something new and worthwhile in other's ideas. The polite and decent exchange of ideas is what makes us all better people. It also makes it so much easier for us all to get along.

As to whether you call it philosophy, religion or metaphysic, it really doesn't matter to me, I think they are all about the same.

Also I don't care what one calls oneself as long as he is honest about. Don't tell everyone you are one thing when in reality you are something else. That's not being honest to yourself or others.

We can only know people on this forum by what they say, if they are not being honest with what they tell you, then you can't form an honest and truthfull picture of them. You won't know with certainty whether you should follow their judgement in anything, let alone something as important as your eternal soul.

We are all individuals, we all have different motives, desires and needs, these all need to be respected. To say "All atheists are this" or "All Christians are that" or "All Theists are something else" is not only untrue but conterproductive. Am I wrong but does not Christianity teach that we shall all be judged on our own merits?

Anyways, thanks for asking the question and thanks for listening to my ramble.
Wayne P is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 09:24 PM   #69
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 184
Default

Magus wouldn't last one second at J-Thunder. Mayhem King would tear his straw-man arguments to shreds.
//riot of disorder:: is offline  
Old 07-06-2003, 12:56 AM   #70
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 183
Default

Quote:
The main problem here with the Christians is that they are always unable to give straight answers to some of the tough philosophical questions that atheist/infidels/whatever ask them.
And if we give you answers, you reject them because they don’t fit “your” criteria of an acceptable answer. Instead of stating it and moving the debate on, many members here ridicule, harass and abuse the Christians.

Quote:
The Christians are very fond of circular logic and holding two contrary ideas at the same time.
I can’t vouch for others, but when asked an opinion or question, I answer based on my beliefs. You answer based on your belief system which is “logic”. I’ve never been trained in formal debate or the theories of logic so I can’t form my answers to meet your expectations.

Quote:
When it is pointed out that the Bible was written by fallible men, most of whom are completely unknown and anonymous, and that other fallible men decided which books would be canonical due to political and power-grabbing considerations, these criticisms are brushed off. Furthermore, there is no contemporary historical record of a person named Jesus and all the Gospels were written some years after the alleged death of the alleged Jesus. There are no eyewitness accounts that are known.
Your opinion, not mine.

Quote:
This inability to answer questions from the atheists has been shown time and again in many different fora on this board. And I'm not an old timer here. Christians get very unhappy when their ideas are challenged to debate, in order to winnow the truth from the falsity. Any ideas and any faith which cannot stand up to honest debate should be highly suspect.
If I’m made aware of questions, I will try to answer them honestly. If a thread I’ve been posting on gets too abusive or pointless because of the bickering and inane comments, I won’t bother returning to the thread. Perhaps you are mistaking a lack of ability to answer with just plain not knowing there is a question there.

Quote:
I have yet to see ONE SINGLE Christian argue with me in a logical manner, point by point, face to face or online, and this whole discussion board is no different.
If you were to ask me questions, I would try to answer them to the best of my abilities. Whether any of that meets with your approval is another matter entirely. I try to answer honestly, with no attempt to try to persuade anyone to my way of thinking. Can you say the same for yourself? Do you feel you have to “win” the argument no matter what?



Quote:
This is the standard I go by, and I think it is a practical one.

"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it.

"Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations.

"Do not believe in anything because it is spoken and rumored by many.

"Do not believe in anything simply because it is written in your religious books.

"Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders.

"But, after observation and analysis, when you find anything that agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it."
By the same token, don’t discount everything just because you heard it, were taught it, read it, or it was passed down by tradition.

I too have applied that to my life. I test everything. It just so happens that we have found different things to be true.
EstherRose is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:39 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.