FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-22-2003, 11:06 AM   #61
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: washington, NJ 07882
Posts: 253
Default

Atheism:
1. Disbelief in or denial of the existence of God or gods.
The doctrine that there is no God or gods

2. Godlessness; immorality.

Atheist:

1. One who disbelieves or denies the existence of God or gods.


That would not include newborns, as they have no concept of god. Not being atheist does not make you a theist by default. I would deem it nontheist, as to represent a lack of a concept of a deity or god. Regardless of whether you consider god concepts to be ridiculous or not, you still have a concept of them if you are atheist, and either choose to deny them or simply disregard them as outrageous.
Vylo is offline  
Old 07-22-2003, 11:16 AM   #62
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Outer Mongolia
Posts: 4,091
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by emotional
Time and again, Matt Slick's point of contention about atheists rings true:

Condescension
This is the most common of all mistakes I've encountered with atheists. I've been told by atheists that I'm an idiot for believing God, that if I were truly intelligent I'd abandon my anachronistic thinking, etc. I've yet to meet a single humble atheist.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I want to go on record - not proudly, just stating a fact - that it is with utter humility and humbleness that, using my admitted limited knowledge and finite mind, I honestly access (after decades of exposure) the claims of literalist supernatural religious belief in general and christinsanity in particular to be apparently nonsensical and useless at best, and at worse immoral/amoral and an obvious danger to peace, sanity, and the general welfare of the human race.

Or, more succinctly, I perceive such to be insane putrid buzzard manure. But that's just my 'humble' yet strong opinion.

If someone misinterprets my strong opinion as a lack of humbleness or as condescension, that's THEIR problem.
JGL53 is offline  
Old 07-22-2003, 11:36 AM   #63
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by SignOfTheCross
86% of the entire world can profess belief in a deity without objective proof, so why is it so difficult for you?
Come on... everybody's doing it.
Shadowy Man is offline  
Old 07-22-2003, 11:41 AM   #64
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Vylo
That would not include newborns, as they have no concept of god. Not being atheist does not make you a theist by default. I would deem it nontheist, as to represent a lack of a concept of a deity or god. Regardless of whether you consider god concepts to be ridiculous or not, you still have a concept of them if you are atheist, and either choose to deny them or simply disregard them as outrageous.
Fine. I am a non-theist.
Autonemesis is offline  
Old 07-22-2003, 12:29 PM   #65
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,088
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by SignOfTheCross
No, I don't use the word 'deny' in that sense. This does not escape the fact atheism is a denial God or gods exist.

Peace,
SOTC
i hate to play word games, but how exactly are you using the word "deny?"

if you were to say that i deny your god, as in declare your definition to be untrue, i'd say ok.

if you were to say that i deny your god, as in refuse to accept, i would say no, as there is nothing to accept because he does not exist.

if you were to say that i deny your god, as in refusing to acknowledge him, i'd say no as since he does not exist, there is nothing to acknowledge.

That being said, i just deny one more god than you.
Paul2 is offline  
Old 07-22-2003, 12:31 PM   #66
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: washington, NJ 07882
Posts: 253
Default

autonemesis, you obviously have some concept of god, if you are commenting intellegently on these boards. No matter how outlandish these concepts may be you have chosen to ignore them as crazy, or to simply deny them. A newborn child has not had this opportunity or exposure.
Vylo is offline  
Old 07-22-2003, 12:45 PM   #67
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Vylo
autonemesis, you obviously have some concept of god, if you are commenting intellegently on these boards. No matter how outlandish these concepts may be you have chosen to ignore them as crazy, or to simply deny them. A newborn child has not had this opportunity or exposure.
Atheism means "without theism." However one arrives at this viewpoint, those without theism are atheist, whether they are newborns or Newdows.
Autonemesis is offline  
Old 07-22-2003, 01:03 PM   #68
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: washington, NJ 07882
Posts: 253
Default

Atheism does not mean without theism, you are using an incorrect definition. I showed the defintion of it earlier:

Atheism:

1. Disbelief in or denial of the existence of God or gods.
The doctrine that there is no God or gods

2. Godlessness; immorality.


You can't deny or disbelief in something you have no concept of, and at the same time you can't affirm it.
Vylo is offline  
Old 07-22-2003, 01:18 PM   #69
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Don't you wish your boy friend got drunk like me,
Posts: 7,808
Lightbulb Infant Infidel

Since everyone is fighting over semantics...

Quote:
atheist

\A"the*ist\, n. [Gr. ? without god; 'a priv. + ? god: cf. F. ath['e]iste.]

1. One who disbelieves or denies the existence of a God, or supreme intelligent Being.

2. A godless person. [Obs.]

Syn: Infidel; unbeliever.

Note: See Infidel.


Seeing as the baby would be 'atheist' and not atheism you are looking up the wrong word in the dictionary and according to the definition above (#2) the baby qualifies as atheist. The baby, not having knowledge of such things yet, is obviously godless...
:notworthy
Spenser is offline  
Old 07-22-2003, 01:22 PM   #70
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Why can't a baby just be a baby and leave it at that? Whether a baby is correctly called an atheist, atheistic, godless, non-theist or otherwise is pointless and pretty much useless as any kind of argument for anything, in any case.
Mageth is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:01 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.