Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-22-2003, 11:06 AM | #61 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: washington, NJ 07882
Posts: 253
|
Atheism:
1. Disbelief in or denial of the existence of God or gods. The doctrine that there is no God or gods 2. Godlessness; immorality. Atheist: 1. One who disbelieves or denies the existence of God or gods. That would not include newborns, as they have no concept of god. Not being atheist does not make you a theist by default. I would deem it nontheist, as to represent a lack of a concept of a deity or god. Regardless of whether you consider god concepts to be ridiculous or not, you still have a concept of them if you are atheist, and either choose to deny them or simply disregard them as outrageous. |
07-22-2003, 11:16 AM | #62 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Outer Mongolia
Posts: 4,091
|
Quote:
Or, more succinctly, I perceive such to be insane putrid buzzard manure. But that's just my 'humble' yet strong opinion. If someone misinterprets my strong opinion as a lack of humbleness or as condescension, that's THEIR problem. |
|
07-22-2003, 11:36 AM | #63 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
|
Quote:
|
|
07-22-2003, 11:41 AM | #64 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
|
Quote:
|
|
07-22-2003, 12:29 PM | #65 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,088
|
Quote:
if you were to say that i deny your god, as in declare your definition to be untrue, i'd say ok. if you were to say that i deny your god, as in refuse to accept, i would say no, as there is nothing to accept because he does not exist. if you were to say that i deny your god, as in refusing to acknowledge him, i'd say no as since he does not exist, there is nothing to acknowledge. That being said, i just deny one more god than you. |
|
07-22-2003, 12:31 PM | #66 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: washington, NJ 07882
Posts: 253
|
autonemesis, you obviously have some concept of god, if you are commenting intellegently on these boards. No matter how outlandish these concepts may be you have chosen to ignore them as crazy, or to simply deny them. A newborn child has not had this opportunity or exposure.
|
07-22-2003, 12:45 PM | #67 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
|
Quote:
|
|
07-22-2003, 01:03 PM | #68 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: washington, NJ 07882
Posts: 253
|
Atheism does not mean without theism, you are using an incorrect definition. I showed the defintion of it earlier:
Atheism: 1. Disbelief in or denial of the existence of God or gods. The doctrine that there is no God or gods 2. Godlessness; immorality. You can't deny or disbelief in something you have no concept of, and at the same time you can't affirm it. |
07-22-2003, 01:18 PM | #69 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Don't you wish your boy friend got drunk like me,
Posts: 7,808
|
Infant Infidel
Since everyone is fighting over semantics...
Quote:
Seeing as the baby would be 'atheist' and not atheism you are looking up the wrong word in the dictionary and according to the definition above (#2) the baby qualifies as atheist. The baby, not having knowledge of such things yet, is obviously godless... :notworthy |
|
07-22-2003, 01:22 PM | #70 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Why can't a baby just be a baby and leave it at that? Whether a baby is correctly called an atheist, atheistic, godless, non-theist or otherwise is pointless and pretty much useless as any kind of argument for anything, in any case.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|