FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-30-2002, 06:08 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,886
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Writer@Large:
<strong>67%. IMO it's a flawed test, only because I always take objection to the phrase "moral obligation," and therefore answered "no" on several questions not because I wouldn't help, but because I wouldn't feel "obligated" to do so.

--W@L</strong>
If you think you would help then you do feel some obligation to do it. Otherwise why choose to help? Just out of boredom?
excreationist is offline  
Old 01-30-2002, 07:05 AM   #12
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 177
Post

Overall: 88%
Geographical: 100%
Family: 100%
Acts & Omissions: 51%
Scale: 100%

Interesting, if the test is valid...

"This suggests that you have utilised a noticeably smaller range of moral principles than average in order to make judgements about the scenarios presented in this test..."

This is true. I find it easier to consider moral issues with a smaller number of generalized principles.
MassAtheist is offline  
Old 01-30-2002, 07:15 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Heaven
Posts: 6,980
Post

No, I don't actually give money to the needy equally in terms of geographical distance, nor because of relations.

However, it doesn't mean that I SHOULD be acting the way I do. I do believe that I should act in a conssent manner, however. That I don't is simply a proof of my relative immorality.
Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ is offline  
Old 01-30-2002, 07:41 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,322
Post

Quote:
QoS: Acts and Omissions : a whopping 83%.
Me, too, on Acts and Omissions! But the overall was lower - 66%, about average.
DRFseven is offline  
Old 01-30-2002, 09:03 AM   #15
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 235
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by excreationist:
<strong>
If you think you would help then you do feel some obligation to do it. Otherwise why choose to help? Just out of boredom?</strong>
You can help someone because you enjoy the feeling it gives you. This is essentially a selfish reason, but it's different than a moral obligation.
Valmorian is offline  
Old 01-30-2002, 06:10 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,322
Post

Quote:
Valmorian: You can help someone because you enjoy the feeling it gives you. This is essentially a selfish reason, but it's different than a moral obligation.
But all motivation is provided by the emotional connection to any stimulus. Everything that is done is done for the feeling.
DRFseven is offline  
Old 01-30-2002, 06:23 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,886
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Jesus Christ:
<strong>No, I don't actually give money to the needy equally in terms of geographical distance, nor because of relations.

However, it doesn't mean that I SHOULD be acting the way I do. I do believe that I should act in a conssent manner, however. That I don't is simply a proof of my relative immorality.</strong>
I thought it was about what you felt compelled to actually DO rather than what you thought seemed "right".

Quote:
<strong>You can help someone because you enjoy the feeling it gives you. This is essentially a selfish reason, but it's different than a moral obligation.</strong>
That's the same thing in my book. We feel we "ought" to do things because of emotions. Maybe this is often because of guilt, but it can also be out of love.

[ January 30, 2002: Message edited by: excreationist ]</p>
excreationist is offline  
Old 01-30-2002, 07:22 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,102
Post

I agree with W@L -- the phrase "morally obligated" stuck in my craw. I don't feel morally obligated to give money to a homeless person, but it's a nice thing to do.

I scored 62% morally parsimonious.

Geographical Distance: 100%
Family: 35%
Acts and Omissions: 35%
Scale: 76%
Monkeybot is offline  
Old 01-30-2002, 07:41 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Heaven
Posts: 6,980
Post

Yeah, I am morally compelled to act in a certain manner. I don't necessarily act in that manner. I guess that was what I was trying to say in my post.

"Do as I say, not as I do."
Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ is offline  
Old 02-03-2002, 03:46 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: hell if I know
Posts: 2,306
Post

I got a 67% overall score. I, too, had a problem with the word "obligated". I've been asked for money by enough panhandlers to have overcome my feelings of "obligation" to "help".

I scored badly on the SCALE portion of the test, because I couldn't get around the question of taking X innocent lives to save Y innocent lives. I'd prefer to just acknowledge that I have not got that kind of power and will never have to make that kind of decision.
freemonkey is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:44 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.