![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#11 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Aug 2000 
				Location: Australia 
				
				
					Posts: 4,886
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#12 | 
| 
			
			 Regular Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2001 
				Location: Massachusetts 
				
				
					Posts: 177
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Overall: 88% 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Geographical: 100% Family: 100% Acts & Omissions: 51% Scale: 100% Interesting, if the test is valid... "This suggests that you have utilised a noticeably smaller range of moral principles than average in order to make judgements about the scenarios presented in this test..." This is true. I find it easier to consider moral issues with a smaller number of generalized principles.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#13 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2001 
				Location: Heaven 
				
				
					Posts: 6,980
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			No, I don't actually give money to the needy equally in terms of geographical distance, nor because of relations. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	However, it doesn't mean that I SHOULD be acting the way I do. I do believe that I should act in a conssent manner, however. That I don't is simply a proof of my relative immorality.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#14 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2001 
				
				
				
					Posts: 2,322
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#15 | |
| 
			
			 Regular Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jun 2000 
				Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada 
				
				
					Posts: 235
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#16 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2001 
				
				
				
					Posts: 2,322
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#17 | ||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Aug 2000 
				Location: Australia 
				
				
					Posts: 4,886
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
 [ January 30, 2002: Message edited by: excreationist ]</p>  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#18 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2001 
				Location: North Carolina 
				
				
					Posts: 8,102
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I agree with W@L -- the phrase "morally obligated" stuck in my craw.  I don't feel morally obligated to give money to a homeless person, but it's a nice thing to do.  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	I scored 62% morally parsimonious. Geographical Distance: 100% Family: 35% Acts and Omissions: 35% Scale: 76%  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#19 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2001 
				Location: Heaven 
				
				
					Posts: 6,980
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Yeah, I am morally compelled to act in a certain manner.  I don't necessarily act in that manner.  I guess that was what I was trying to say in my post. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	"Do as I say, not as I do."  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#20 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2001 
				Location: hell if I know 
				
				
					Posts: 2,306
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I got a 67% overall score. I, too, had a problem with the word "obligated". I've been asked for money by enough panhandlers to have overcome my feelings of "obligation" to "help". 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	I scored badly on the SCALE portion of the test, because I couldn't get around the question of taking X innocent lives to save Y innocent lives. I'd prefer to just acknowledge that I have not got that kind of power and will never have to make that kind of decision.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |