Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Doctor X · 08-06-2003, 01:58 AM

nonhomogenized:

Indeed. Adherence to Infidels promises encounters with virgins prior to "ascent."

Jutsuka:

"If first you don't succeed, try . . . try again!"

--J.D.

Aravnah Ornan · 08-06-2003, 05:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TimeGoddess
Can I answer twice? Once for number of partners while a xtian, and second for the number of partners after deconvertion. There were far more partners when I was a xtian, but then again, I deconverted only a few months ago. Maybe I should include furture partners? HA!

When I was a true believer, I was the town tramp. Since deconversion, I've had exactly one partner.

Here's an irony for those who say that atheists cannot be truly moral. Since my deconversion, I can no longer hide behind "greasy grace" and must accept accountability for my own actions.

beth · 08-06-2003, 05:09 AM

I think it's rather fun to experiment with just one partner. Besides, who wants to break in another love slave?

Shadowy Man · 08-06-2003, 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Benjamin Franklin
I believe you forgot to include another option. Virgin but not by choice

At least not by your choice.

BigJim · 08-06-2003, 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jutsuka
1. I have no interest in either sex or love. The first and only time I had sex I wondered what all the fuss was about. It was moderately enjoyable but that was all.

Maybe your partner had something to do with that?

openeyes · 08-06-2003, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Here's an irony for those who say that atheists cannot be truly moral. Since my deconversion, I can no longer hide behind "greasy grace" and must accept accountability for my own actions.

I guy I know said basically the same thing. When he was Catholic he could always go to confession and be absolved for his sins, but as an atheist, he felt more responsibility to the other person involved which slowed him down.

Non-praying Mantis · 08-06-2003, 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by NonHomogenized
Edited to add: wow! I'm not in the largest group. As the largest group is presently virgins, I can say that with considerable pleasure.

Ditto that!

NPM

viscousmemories · 08-06-2003, 09:21 AM

I just noticed the little Freudian slip in the poll title.

christ-on-a-stick · 08-06-2003, 09:36 AM

Alright, who are the other 3 who voted with me?

viscousmemories · 08-06-2003, 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by christ-on-a-stick
Alright, who are the other 3 who voted with me?

Not me, but I'm guessing at least 2 of 'em are posers.

I have no idea how many women I've been with, but I'll say:

"More than I should have and fewer than I wanted to".

vm

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

08-06-2003, 01:58 AM	#21
Doctor X Banned Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: USA Posts: 3,794	nonhomogenized: Indeed. Adherence to Infidels promises encounters with virgins prior to "ascent." Jutsuka: "If first you don't succeed, try . . . try again!" --J.D.

08-06-2003, 05:09 AM	#23
beth Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: where orange blossoms bloom... Posts: 1,802	I think it's rather fun to experiment with just one partner. Besides, who wants to break in another love slave?

08-06-2003, 09:21 AM	#28
viscousmemories Veteran Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: Austin, Texas Posts: 1,387	I just noticed the little Freudian slip in the poll title.

08-06-2003, 09:36 AM	#29
christ-on-a-stick Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Durango, Colorado Posts: 7,116	Alright, who are the other 3 who voted with me?

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.