![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#31 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,855
|
![]()
What a great gun control thread this is.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Stepford, CT
Posts: 4,296
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 1,001
|
![]() Quote:
Oh, and if children poke the robots out of curiousity, the robot might just attack the child. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: South Africa
Posts: 2,194
|
![]()
shome,
I would really like you to read my earlier post, and vindicate comparing a dog to a robot. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
|
![]()
Shome, I think you're reaching big time...dogs are living beings not computers. The analogy should be with children not objects as has been pointed out.
If children poke and prod other children, the other children may attack. |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: South Africa
Posts: 2,194
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,855
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#38 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 1,001
|
![]() Quote:
The reason that I used robots is because they are more reliable than dogs, yet people would still not feel comfortable giving them the ability to kill. Why then, are they comfortable having killer dogs around, which are far less reliable???? Children, unlike dogs, can be reasoned with. They have rational minds. And if a child is so young that it can't be reasoned with, then it's too young to be a danger anyway. And even if it cannot be reasoned with and hurts people, then there's nothing we can do because children, being humans, have the right to be free until they screw up. Anything less than human does not have that right and can be preemtively taken out of society because its too dangerous. Now, if you want to elevate the rights of dogs to those of humans, that's a whole 'nother debate. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
|
![]()
Do you have some statistics you are working from? There are 10's of millions of dogs in the US most of whom live out their 10 or 15 years without ever biting. Where are you getting the idea they they are completely unpredictable and attacks are imminent at any given moment? Why do you think leash laws and confinement laws aren't adequate...basically on what are you basing your assertion that dogs are a big dangerous and uncontrolled problem?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 1,001
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|