FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-18-2003, 02:45 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 1,708
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Shake
Suzanne (Welcome, btw!) and Javaman, I can't find the articles/letters that you were talking about. But I did find this interesting piece from the link Suzanne provided. It's pretty good.
And, Shake, I guess the Omaha World Herald does their URLs different than other papers. To see the letter I referred to, you'd have to change to the Sunday edition (at the bottom of the link I posted). It wasn't that big of a deal, really. This was the sentence that fired me up:

"Perhaps we need to consider that our tolerance for socialist and atheist views in the media and the educational arenas is educating our own progeny to be enemies of democracy."

The subject has been tackled elsewhere on II but, imagine if the author of that piece had put any other group of people in there... I don't know, how 'bout Lutherans? Jews? Hispanics? It all comes back to the mindset that, "I don't care what you believe, it may be weird or wrong, but you'd better believe something."
Javaman is offline  
Old 03-26-2003, 10:17 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 925
Default

Quote:
Abortion would be covered by the prohibition of murder.
Are you certain about this? If I remember correctly, the oh-so-infallible Bible doesn't give the same status to an unborn child as it does any other person.

I don't have my references here, but I do seem to remember that if a man strikes a woman and kills her unborn child he must pay a fine. If he kills the woman, then he is put to death. This seems to indicate even the Bible doesn't see an unborn child as a person.
(Can't verify at the moment - my employer blocks search engines on our web access.)
Joel is offline  
Old 03-26-2003, 10:29 AM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Even when it has been illegal, abortion has never in the history of legal thought been equated to murder, except in the rhetoric of anti-abortion extremists trying to rouse the troops.

One of the most effective arguments against the "pro-life" position is to ask if they really want to take women who have had abortions and try them for murder, with the possibility of captial punishment. At that point, people instinctively realize that abortion is not murder.
Toto is offline  
Old 03-26-2003, 11:15 AM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally posted by Javaman
And, Shake, I guess the Omaha World Herald does their URLs different than other papers. To see the letter I referred to, you'd have to change to the Sunday edition (at the bottom of the link I posted). It wasn't that big of a deal, really. This was the sentence that fired me up:

"Perhaps we need to consider that our tolerance for socialist and atheist views in the media and the educational arenas is educating our own progeny to be enemies of democracy."

The subject has been tackled elsewhere on II but, imagine if the author of that piece had put any other group of people in there... I don't know, how 'bout Lutherans? Jews? Hispanics? It all comes back to the mindset that, "I don't care what you believe, it may be weird or wrong, but you'd better believe something."
Ahhh! OK Javaman, I found the one that you've quoted, but I still couldn't find the full letter that Suzanne mentioned. And yes, that is ... ummm, ignorant to say the least.

It also comes back to the "socialist"="atheist"="immoral" mindset. :banghead:
Shake is offline  
Old 03-26-2003, 08:20 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,666
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Joel
I don't have my references here, but I do seem to remember that if a man strikes a woman and kills her unborn child he must pay a fine. If he kills the woman, then he is put to death. This seems to indicate even the Bible doesn't see an unborn child as a person.
(Can't verify at the moment - my employer blocks search engines on our web access.)
That would be the verses I mentioned earlier.
Exodus 21:22-23:
If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life
BigBlue2 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:27 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.