FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 02:40 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-24-2003, 12:26 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,570
Default Saddam vs. Dubya

This just in:

Saddam challenges Dubya to an International debate regarding the upcoming war.

Should I rush out and get popcorn?

*moderator*, can you change the header to saddam vs. dubya? I would like to keep this thread subject specific. thank you [Done - 99%]
Primordial Groove is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 01:50 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: St Louis area
Posts: 3,458
Default

Let me make my prediction: Bush will decline, saying that he doesn't debate with Evildoers, or some such.
MortalWombat is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 03:03 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: ...
Posts: 2,191
Talking

Saddam just doesn't get it - violence is the only way to solve problems!
Krieger is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 03:22 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,570
Default

The interview will be aired tonight on cbs evening news.

I would really like to see this, although it would be short:

Saddam-Where is your proof, Bush?

Dubya-Ad Hominem

Saddam-that is not proof.

Dubya-Ad Hominem

Saddam-...

Dubya-...
Primordial Groove is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 03:29 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 712
Talking

I'd bet Saddam has a better grasp of the English language....

HR
Hayden is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 04:08 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
Default

I think a better idea would be to give them boxing gloves and have them duke it out the old fashioned way.

Amen-Moses
Amen-Moses is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 05:03 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Spudtopia, ID
Posts: 5,315
Default

I vote we settle this disput with a spelling bee. Bush vs Saddam. Can you image the hilarity?
ex-idaho is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 05:24 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ex-idaho
I vote we settle this disput with a spelling bee. Bush vs Saddam. Can you image the hilarity?
No contest, how on earth would an American ever win a spelling bee?

Amen-Moses
Amen-Moses is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 07:15 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North America
Posts: 1,603
Default

Posted by Krieger:
Quote:
Saddam just doesn't get it - violence is the only way to solve problems!
And where have you been the past quarter century??

Cheers!
leonarde is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 08:38 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 7,018
Default

I wrote yesterday in another cite, about the international press etc.
Quote:
I have written and suggested this before, about the lemmings (or parrots):
<snip>
But still, after that the main news goes as usual, for the 90%:
One lemming writes a story and the other lemmings copies and "streamlines" it.

I am still curious: Why do not the ABC, BBC and others, just make the same questions to the different countries representatives?
Just like take the foreign minister of Iraq and the equal from USA and give them ready written questions?


You say they would not agree to give their propaganda? Crap.
If the questions are written beforehand, and given the parties a chance to formulate some questions themselves, put the shit through the satellite etc. one in Bagdad or Paris, one in Washington.
You think one of the sides would refuse a prime-time hour. OK. Tell both, that if the other is absent, we give You the whole one hour of prime-time.
You think they would still refuse?
The media has incredible power, but it does not use it.

And do you think people would watch that program? All over the world!
And so on.

But these fucking lemmings with resources does nothing else than change the headline of the story that Reuters cables out.

Naturally if there is news like: "North-Korea has made an alliance with Saddam: We will attack South, if USA attacks Iraq. Syria and Iran is wagering, knowing they are the next!", could and would not be hush-hushed anywhere.

But when the braking news are: "The president has a penis and he admits it"-style, the whole Europe is laughing.
Or did You see the writings on the walls in former Yugoslavia: "Monica, why did You not use Your teeth?"

It is true, now nobody is laughing, not even to the "braking news". We are all f^=>()% worried!

The world is at a brink of deep depression, and some guy wants a war, on arguments that he could use against a dozen of countries.
And the news: "How stupid, ungrateful are not the French, Germans, the devil and his grandmother..."
Sic.
I can't understand why people (in this other cite) are so afraid of a debate?
The US refusal will give a very strong propaganda victory to Saddam. Do You wish that?
White house could just explain that this debate could be done on a lower level, foreign ministers etc, because it is in the range of their work. That's all.
Would Saddam give his minister free speach for an hour? I think he would.

P.S. Do You know what Iraq says about the extra range?
They claim that their test-missile was withouth a warhead and that kind of stuff. That is why it was lighter, why it flew longer. Right or wrong, the question is:
"Have You seen much news about this?"

Henry
Henry-Finland is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:32 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.