![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#11 | 
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2002 
				Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy 
				
				
					Posts: 12,048
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			1 + 1 = 3  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	. . . . . . . . . . . (for very large values of 1)  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#12 | |
| 
			
			 Senior Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jul 2000 
				Location: Sweden 
				
				
					Posts: 833
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			e^(i*pi)=-1 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	and move the 1 to the left hand side to get: (e^(i*Pi))+1 = 0 and you have , explicitly, five numbers of grave importance mixed into the same equation 0,1,e,Pi and i Abacus: Quote: 
	
 So that is , by far, the most beautiful equation in all of Maths if you ask me. (not to say that in any way have seen them all, some in this thread are unfamiliar to me) 2. a^n+b^n != c^n for n > 2 where n is a natural number. (Fermats last theorem solved by Andrew Wiles not so long ago, mid 90's I think) If n = 2 you get the Pythagorean theorem we all recognize. 3. Fundamental theorem of Calculus (which comes in the form of an equation) [ September 25, 2002: Message edited by: Bloop ]</p>  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#13 | 
| 
			
			 Senior Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2001 
				Location: Toronto 
				
				
					Posts: 808
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			What is the 'e' in e^(i*pi)=-1? is it in the same league as 0, 1, i and pi?
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#14 | 
| 
			
			 Moderator - Science Discussions 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2001 
				Location: Providence, RI, USA 
				
				
					Posts: 9,908
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Christopher Lord: 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	What is the 'e' in e^(i*pi)=-1? is it in the same league as 0, 1, i and pi? Yup, it's one of the "biggies"--like pi it shows up in a lot of places, but it's probably most well known for being the basis of the <a href="http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NaturalLogarithm.html" target="_blank">natural logarithm</a>, which has a simpler derivative than logarithms in other bases. Here's some <a href="http://mathworld.wolfram.com/e.html" target="_blank">more info</a> on e, and here's an <a href="http://www.math.toronto.edu/mathnet/questionCorner/epii.html" target="_blank">explanation</a> of the equation e^(pi*i) = -1.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#15 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2002 
				Location: Singapore 
				
				
					Posts: 3,956
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			According to Euler's equation, the exponential function, e^(pi*i) = -1 = cos(pi) + isin(pi). Anyway, I, myself, prefer Laplace and Poisson Equations.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#16 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Nov 2001 
				Location: NCSU 
				
				
					Posts: 5,853
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			<ol type="1">[*]p' = p^2+p(1-p)=p[*]p' =(w11*p^2+w12*p*(1-p))/(w11*p^2+w12*2p(1-p)+w22*(1-p)^2)[*]q* = (u/s)^0.5[/list=a]
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#17 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Aug 2002 
				Location: Silver City, New Mexico 
				
				
					Posts: 1,872
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 The inverse function of e^x, of course, is the natural logarithm, which is the integral of 1/x, and has other neat properties, as Jesse points out. So yes, it is one of the biggies. Oh, and like pi, its an irrational number.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#18 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2002 
				Location: South Dakota 
				
				
					Posts: 2,214
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Some others that really fascinate me are the Taylor series expansions of e^x, cos(x), and sin(x): 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	e^x = 1 + x + 1/2!*x^2 + 1/3!*x^3 + ... cos(x) = 1 - 1/2!*x^2 + ... sin(x) = x - 1/3!*x^3 + ... I wish I knew how to display them with the sigma summation notation. Edited to fix sign errors. [ September 25, 2002: Message edited by: Abacus ]</p>  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#19 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: May 2002 
				Location: Gainesville, FL 
				
				
					Posts: 1,827
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			My favorite three: 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	1. Newton's formulation of gravity (in my opinion the single most important equation in all physics--it, or rather the process of determining it, started the revolution that continues today). 2. Maxwell's Equations (okay, okay--there are four of them here, but they're all "one" if you know what I mean), because they were the first step down the path of unification. 3. Euler-Lagrange's calculus of variations (perhaps the single most important mathematical contribution to physics in history, for its application ranges from the mundane "ball in a bowl" to the complex nuances of electrons passing through slits).  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#20 | ||||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2001 
				Location: arse-end of the world 
				
				
					Posts: 2,305
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
   Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
  | 
||||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |