Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-23-2003, 05:16 PM | #21 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Albucrazy, New Mexico
Posts: 1,425
|
whyevolution.com
www.whyevolution.com
How is it that, no matter what, these fallacies continue to be propagated? Amazing...and sad. |
01-27-2003, 04:59 AM | #22 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
|
Quote:
Boro Nut |
|
01-27-2003, 12:26 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Narcisco, RRR
Posts: 527
|
Quote:
Cheers, KC |
|
01-27-2003, 09:21 PM | #24 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 422
|
Quote:
|
|
01-28-2003, 01:49 AM | #25 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: California
Posts: 646
|
Quote:
I actually find the each-black-hole-spawns-new-universe theory fairly appealing. Mostly on the following: Universe: started with a point of infinite (more or less ) density, currently can't communicate with anything outside the universe. Black hole: point of infinite density, can't communicate between inside and outside. Negatives: If our universe is a black hole, what is happening to the stuff falling into it? Does this provide the energy of expansion or something? Conservation of mass and maybe the second law of thermodynamics have been violated. Then again, these are laws made to be broken when it comes to the origin of the friggin' universe. The other theory I like is that of a flat universe where all of the matter, energy, etc. add up to (approximately) zero. Thus, to a first approximation nothing ever was created, the universe is just a particularly extravagent and unusual form of nothing. I think I'll go to bed now, otherwise I might have to start slamming my head against the wall... |
||
01-28-2003, 04:49 AM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ecuador
Posts: 738
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|