FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-14-2002, 08:24 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,427
Talking

Cheer up Oolon, and remember how lucky you are to have an intelligently designed endoskeleton.
bluefugue is offline  
Old 02-14-2002, 08:53 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 762
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Oolon Colluphid:
<strong>Oolon the miserable </strong>

Why? It's a good idea... just needs a bit more research, such as checking what percentage of insects eat their moltings, and a correlation with their biomass showing how much waste is going on...

Plus, you have demonstrated scientific integrity! You are perfectly willing to get rid of the hypothesis if it doesn't stand up. So be happy.
Kevin Dorner is offline  
Old 02-14-2002, 09:07 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
Post

The endoskeleton we possess is not a particularly good design, either. It's brittle, prone to separation and degeneration at the joints, and affords very little protection for some important structures such as the spinal cord.
Dr Rick is offline  
Old 02-14-2002, 09:18 AM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
Post

Oh all right...

Oolon
Oolon Colluphid is offline  
Old 02-16-2002, 08:01 AM   #15
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Post

However, our internal skeleton is much more scalable than an external one, and it does not get molted.

The largest arthropod is likely some eurypterid (Paleozoic sea scorpion); some are known that are 2 meters (over 6 feet) long. The largest living one may

However, by the standards of vertebrate gigantism, that is a shrimp.

IMO, the real difficulty with molting is what happens when the animal has shed its old skin and its new skin has yet to harden -- a window of vulnerability.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 02-16-2002, 08:20 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,587
Talking

Oolon, you are forgetting one thing. We were all perfectly designed...but after the fall...uh..somehow...adam and eve and their free choice to eat the fruit...uh...changed the very genetics of every animal...somehow...and so it was adam and eve really and not God...

Adam and Eve: The Ultimate Geneticists.
pug846 is offline  
Old 02-16-2002, 09:09 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,427
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by lpetrich:
<strong>The largest arthropod is likely some eurypterid (Paleozoic sea scorpion); some are known that are 2 meters (over 6 feet) long. The largest living one may

However, by the standards of vertebrate gigantism, that is a shrimp.</strong>
I thought the main factor limiting arthropods' (or at least insects') size was their respiratory system. If this problem didn't exist, would it still be impossible to have an elephant-sized arthropod -- would it be crushed under the weight of its own exoskeleton?

[ February 16, 2002: Message edited by: IesusDomini ]</p>
bluefugue is offline  
Old 02-18-2002, 05:55 AM   #18
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Indiana
Posts: 4,379
Lightbulb

Oooh, oooh.. I can answer this one! In short, yes. Try making two spiders out of clay. First, make one real small, then try a huge one. You'll notice that the large one's legs can't support the weight. This is a disadvantage of an exoskelaton, and a reason we never have to worry about the horrible planet depicted in "Starship Troopers."
Free Thinkr is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:31 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.