FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-22-2003, 08:36 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the land of two boys and no sleep.
Posts: 9,890
Default

The Straight Dope had a piece on the very topic of cross-breeding humans and chimpanzees.

I can't seem to find the exact article, but one could search for it here
Wyz_sub10 is offline  
Old 07-25-2003, 04:14 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,606
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by sullster

I still don't understand why this 2% story was put into newspapers and a magazine last month, if it is no big news
Mainly because of the 'interest factor'. It almost sounds like a setup for a male/female joke... so people found it interesting (I did).
No it does not upset any established science or anthropology.

Jay
jayh is offline  
Old 08-01-2003, 04:07 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 1,392
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jayh
Mainly because of the 'interest factor'. It almost sounds like a setup for a male/female joke... so people found it interesting (I did).
No it does not upset any established science or anthropology.

Jay
Thanks Jay for your responce.

You say that this 2% story does not upset any established science or anthropology, yet it could upset political or social ideologies.

Could it not upset feminist ideology by hinting at quantifiable differences between the sexes in the DNA? These differences could support a whole range of differences between males and females that could run counter to ideological views.

Thus, could this 2% story really have been a provocation, rather than a big science tidbit?
sullster is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 03:39 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,606
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by sullster
Thanks Jay for your responce.

Could it not upset feminist ideology by hinting at quantifiable differences between the sexes in the DNA? These differences could support a whole range of differences between males and females that could run counter to ideological views.
I suppose it could, but that issue has largely been established through recent research on psychology and evolutionary psychology. Sexes have different optimizational strategies, and this is what one would really expect.

Interestingly the differences between men and women are likely to be more hormonal than genetic (though in the case of humans and most mammals, genetics triggers significant amounts of hormone production). In many reptiles, for example, males and females are genetically identical, sex (including the development of sex organs and sexual behavior) is determined by temperature and other conditions that occur during incubation.

This particular headline sounds more like a party chat tidbit than a serious overturning of scientific thought.

J
jayh is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 03:46 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 1,211
Default

I don't see why it should upset feminist ideology unless that ideology actually want women to be men, which would seem fairly unlikely.

There are obvious some fundamental differences beteen males and females genetically, there is also a spectrum of intermediate states which almost all have a genetic basis.
Wounded King is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 08:04 AM   #16
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Paris
Posts: 8,473
Default

I'd say the unspoken implication here is based on faulty logic:

abs(x-y)=abs(x-z), therefore y=z

Or, in English, there exists the same *amount* of genetic differences between man and woman as exists between man and chimp, therefore woman equals chimp.

The statement doesn't, of course cater for the type of differences that are present in each comparison.

To plug some values into the equation:

Abs(6-4)=abs(6-8) [True], therefore 4=8[er, untrue]

The creatos seem to love this type of story and readily supply the faulty logic, apparently hoping that no-one will notice. "you see,", I can hear them say, "the geneticists tell us that chimps are the same as woman, which is obviously untrue, therefore they're liars".
Nialler is offline  
Old 08-06-2003, 03:24 PM   #17
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 77
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by villainess
I can't help being morbidly curious whether it would be more feasible to hide the offspring of such an experiment in the monkey house, or on a Greyhound bus in Indiana.

the.villainess
I once took an overnight Greyhound bus from the south side of Chicago up to Minneapolis St. Paul. Based on my experience, I've gotta go with the bus scenario. Go Greyhound, and leave the driving to them (while I just tried not to touch anything with my bare skin, and held my breath for much of the ride).
streamline is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:14 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.