Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-25-2003, 04:14 AM | #12 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,606
|
Quote:
No it does not upset any established science or anthropology. Jay |
|
08-01-2003, 04:07 PM | #13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 1,392
|
Quote:
You say that this 2% story does not upset any established science or anthropology, yet it could upset political or social ideologies. Could it not upset feminist ideology by hinting at quantifiable differences between the sexes in the DNA? These differences could support a whole range of differences between males and females that could run counter to ideological views. Thus, could this 2% story really have been a provocation, rather than a big science tidbit? |
|
08-06-2003, 03:39 AM | #14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,606
|
Quote:
Interestingly the differences between men and women are likely to be more hormonal than genetic (though in the case of humans and most mammals, genetics triggers significant amounts of hormone production). In many reptiles, for example, males and females are genetically identical, sex (including the development of sex organs and sexual behavior) is determined by temperature and other conditions that occur during incubation. This particular headline sounds more like a party chat tidbit than a serious overturning of scientific thought. J |
|
08-06-2003, 03:46 AM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 1,211
|
I don't see why it should upset feminist ideology unless that ideology actually want women to be men, which would seem fairly unlikely.
There are obvious some fundamental differences beteen males and females genetically, there is also a spectrum of intermediate states which almost all have a genetic basis. |
08-06-2003, 08:04 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Paris
Posts: 8,473
|
I'd say the unspoken implication here is based on faulty logic:
abs(x-y)=abs(x-z), therefore y=z Or, in English, there exists the same *amount* of genetic differences between man and woman as exists between man and chimp, therefore woman equals chimp. The statement doesn't, of course cater for the type of differences that are present in each comparison. To plug some values into the equation: Abs(6-4)=abs(6-8) [True], therefore 4=8[er, untrue] The creatos seem to love this type of story and readily supply the faulty logic, apparently hoping that no-one will notice. "you see,", I can hear them say, "the geneticists tell us that chimps are the same as woman, which is obviously untrue, therefore they're liars". |
08-06-2003, 03:24 PM | #17 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|