Freethought & Rationalism Archive

scombrid · 08-02-2002, 05:01 AM

Hey, without circumcision, Lord Helmet's costume wouldn't have been half as funny.

2tadpoles · 08-04-2002, 09:40 AM

Here are some interesting sites dealing with circumcision. This first one is a very lengthy, but informative article.

"FROM RITUAL TO SCIENCE:
THE MEDICAL TRANSFORMATION OF CIRCUMCISION IN AMERICA"
<a href="http://www.nocirc.org/articles/gollaher.html" target="_blank">http://www.nocirc.org/articles/gollaher.html</a>

"Male Sexual Anatomy: The Foreskin"
<a href="http://net.indra.com/~shredder/intact/anatomy/index.html" target="_blank">http://net.indra.com/~shredder/intact/anatomy/index.html</a>

"Circumcision and Urinary Tract Infection"
<a href="http://www.circumstitions.com/Utis.html" target="_blank">http://www.circumstitions.com/Utis.html</a>
(suggests that much of the reason that intact boys have higher UTI rates than circed boys is because of forced retraction of the foreskin, which is normally adhered to the glans in small boys)

Tangie
Mom to two intact boys.

Autonemesis · 08-04-2002, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Frogsmoocher:
Here are some interesting sites dealing with circumcision. This first one is a very lengthy...

No doubt.

Dr Rick · 08-04-2002, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Frogsmoocher:
This first one is a very lengthy...

It's posted on an anti-circ site, so they probably couldn't cut it.

Rick

Opera Nut · 08-06-2002, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Personal preferences aside, there are no good clinical studies that suggest sex for or with an uncircumcised male is any more or less satisfying than sex for or with a circumcised man.

Rick

Uh, Rick, I don't think clinical studies are necessary. I already told everyone here(if they give a flying fornication) about MY real-world experience. Cut male:I have a very sore vagina after sex. Uncut male: No sore vagina even after lots of screwy-face (that is what comes after kissy-face). A sore vagina does not contribute anything to the pleasure derived from intercourse. Extremely obvious, and it doesn't need to be confirmed by alleged clinical studies.
<img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" />

2tadpoles · 08-07-2002, 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by rbochnermd:


It's posted on an anti-circ site, so they probably couldn't cut it.

Rick

LOL!

Denshuu · 08-07-2002, 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Frogsmoocher:
Here are some interesting sites dealing with circumcision. This first one is a very lengthy...

Nah... it just looks that way.

Anunnaki · 08-07-2002, 05:08 AM

You people are wasting your time arguing with rbochnermd about this.

We all had a very long and heated discussion about circumcision last year. Rbochnermd is so pro circumcision that if I weren`t an atheist I might assume that Yahweh sends rbochnermd a $2.00 check everytime a baby somewhere in the world loses his foreskin.

GunnerJ · 08-08-2002, 02:47 PM

OK... If we can't be funny, we can at least calm down...

Anunnaki · 08-08-2002, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rimstalker:
OK... If we can't be funny, we can at least calm down...

Yeesh! It was a joke.

I guess a sense of humor isn`t a requirment to moderate a humor forum.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

08-02-2002, 05:01 AM	#31
scombrid Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Central Florida Posts: 2,759	Hey, without circumcision, Lord Helmet's costume wouldn't have been half as funny.

08-04-2002, 09:40 AM	#32
2tadpoles Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: next door to H.P. Lovecraft Posts: 565	Here are some interesting sites dealing with circumcision. This first one is a very lengthy, but informative article. "FROM RITUAL TO SCIENCE: THE MEDICAL TRANSFORMATION OF CIRCUMCISION IN AMERICA" <a href="http://www.nocirc.org/articles/gollaher.html" target="_blank">http://www.nocirc.org/articles/gollaher.html</a> "Male Sexual Anatomy: The Foreskin" <a href="http://net.indra.com/~shredder/intact/anatomy/index.html" target="_blank">http://net.indra.com/~shredder/intact/anatomy/index.html</a> "Circumcision and Urinary Tract Infection" <a href="http://www.circumstitions.com/Utis.html" target="_blank">http://www.circumstitions.com/Utis.html</a> (suggests that much of the reason that intact boys have higher UTI rates than circed boys is because of forced retraction of the foreskin, which is normally adhered to the glans in small boys) Tangie Mom to two intact boys.

08-07-2002, 05:08 AM	#38
Anunnaki Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: I`ve left and gone away Posts: 699	You people are wasting your time arguing with rbochnermd about this. We all had a very long and heated discussion about circumcision last year. Rbochnermd is so pro circumcision that if I weren`t an atheist I might assume that Yahweh sends rbochnermd a $2.00 check everytime a baby somewhere in the world loses his foreskin.

08-08-2002, 02:47 PM	#39
GunnerJ Banned Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want Posts: 4,871	OK... If we can't be funny, we can at least calm down...

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.