![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#31 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: USA expat, now living in France
Posts: 1,153
|
![]()
Men and women who volunteer and are qualified for the job should be allowed to do any job out there, including combat. I can't imagine anyone wanting to do that sort of work, but it takes all kinds.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: California
Posts: 56
|
![]()
Rufus,
Southernhybrid beat me to the punch. That's what I was trying to say. Just to clarify, I personally am agreeing with you. ![]() ab |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Execution State, USA
Posts: 5,031
|
![]() Quote:
My already-shaky faith in the overall intelligence of the human race just took another little dive. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Twin Cities, USA
Posts: 3,197
|
![]()
What is the history of selective service? When did the US implement this program? I was not able to find out this information from the selective service website.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Location
Posts: 398
|
![]()
I believe that it was instituted during the Reagan administration. I remember because I was in high school at the time, so it directly affected me.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mars
Posts: 2,231
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Martin Buber |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 1,392
|
![]()
I say "yes", if the combat that is being referred to is old fashioned ground pounding infantry. The male is more physically and mentally attuned to the grinding pace of ground combat.
I know some history, and realise that the Red Army used women in combat during WW2. Women womaned artillery, drove tanks and were snipers. The reason I am not going to use this example to contradict my previous opposition to women in combat in the US military is that we are not in a situation like the USSR was during the German invasion. We just don't need women at the front when there are so many able males who are more suited to the job. Women can do all sorts of other tasks and even combat roles, such as fighter pilots or firing weapons from ships. There is no need for women at the front. I will never support this, unless an enemy army invades the US. |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 46
|
![]()
Allow me to add three Russian women became aces flying combat aircraft in WW2.
Lilya Litvak 12 kills Yekaterina Budanova 17 kills Olga Yamschikova 11 kills Litvak was awarded Hero of the Soviet Union, the highest Russian decoration. |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,082
|
![]() Quote:
There are plenty of women who are physically more capable of enduring combat than I am. The test should be "can this person actually do the work?" not "does this person have the right genitals?" Men in the military have physical fitness tests to ensure they're capable of doing the work. If a woman can pass the same tests, then she is equally fit to fight. Even if an "average" woman is weaker than an "average" man, it's real and specific people who sign up for the military, not gender averages. Welcome to the 21st century. It's probably different to what you're used to. |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|