FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-21-2002, 10:06 AM   #91
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
Post

Corwin:
Quote:
The point is kal.... disciplines change. What Bree's talking about may not be 'classical homeopathy' but it still falls under the modern heading. Hell modern evolutionary theory isn't all that much like classical Darwinism either....
Sure, if homeopathy wishes to abandon its fundamental principles ("like cures like" and "the law of infinitesimals") and start using treatment that have a chance of working, fine. Of course, that would make them no different than conventional medicine, and they should be held to the same standards.
tronvillain is offline  
Old 05-21-2002, 10:15 AM   #92
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
Post

Corwin:
Quote:
This has to be one of the most ironic statements in this thread.... since they're right.

What wiped out smallpox? Oh, that's right.... giving people small doses of it so that they'd build up a resistance to the virus.

What would have happened if they'd been given the virus at full strength? Oh, that's right.... they'd have died.

pshhhhhhhhft.

*waves his hand at you*
No, they're not. Homeopaths use dilutions which essentially ensure that none of the "remedy" remains, but claim that the dilution makes it more effective.

As for smallpox, initial vaccination was done with cowpox, not a diluted solution of smallpox. Before that, variolation was used to transer smallpox from a person with a mild form of smallpox, but this resulted in quite a few deaths.
tronvillain is offline  
Old 05-21-2002, 10:24 AM   #93
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,369
Cool

Innoculation itself causes a fair number of deaths. That's why we don't do it anymore... now that we've discovered vaccination. (Innoculations are only done for diseases we haven't discovered an actual vaccine for.)

YOU claim that homeopaths dilute their medications to the point where there isn't any of the cure left. I haven't heard homeopaths claim that.

An example.... how do you become immune to botula toxin?
Corwin is offline  
Old 05-21-2002, 02:47 PM   #94
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 235
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Corwin:
<strong>
YOU claim that homeopaths dilute their medications to the point where there isn't any of the cure left. I haven't heard homeopaths claim that.
</strong>
<a href="http://www.ncahf.org/pp/homeop.html" target="_blank">http://www.ncahf.org/pp/homeop.html</a>

Particularly this section:

"Hahnemann's Law of Infinitesimals holds that the smaller the dose of a medication, the more powerful will be its healing effects. He taught that substances could be potentized (i.e., their "immaterial and spiritual powers" released to make active substances more active, and inactive substances active). The process of potentizing involved the sequential dilution of remedial agents by succussion in which initial mixtures would be shaken at least 40 times, nine parts dumped, and nine parts of solvent added and shaken again. This process was repeated as many times as desired. Tapping on a leather pad or the heel of the hand was alleged to double the dilution-a notion that contradicts the laws of physics. Remedies are diluted to powers of ten and labeled with combinations of Arabic and Roman numerals (e.g., 3X= 1/1000, 4X= 1/10,000, 3C or 6X= 1/1,000,000, etc.). The fact that 19th-Century homeopathic remedies were dilute placebos made them preferable to the harsh concoctions being applied by the humoral practitioners.

According to the laws of chemistry, there is a limit to the dilution that can be made without losing the original substance altogether. This limit, called Avogadro's number (6.023 x 10-23) corresponds to homeopathic potencies of 12C or 24X (1 part in 1024). At this dilution there is less than a 50% chance that even one molecule of active material remains. Hahnemann himself realized that there was virtually no chance that any of the original substance remained at such high dilution, but explained it away in metaphysical terms. In addition to being contradicted by common sense, homeopathy's Law of Infinitesimals is invalidated by pharmaceutical dose-response studies."


It is clear that homeopathy indicates that smaller doses increase potency. Every medication taken today invalidates this. If I take 1 aspirin, I should end up with a stronger reaction than if I take 2?
Valmorian is offline  
Old 05-21-2002, 02:59 PM   #95
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,322
Post

Quote:
alek: So I rather put up with the pain all at once, and when I wake up next morning I feel great. In any case, thanks for the advice.

Actually what I find most bothersome is not migraine itself but visual auras before it starts, as well as feeling very confused and disoriented. Is there any cure for that part?
That's the beauty of sumatriptan; it's not a pain-killer; there are no side-effects I can notice! It treats the receptor sites that give rise to the vascular changes that cause all the migraine symptoms - pain, disorientation, aura, nausea, as well as sensitivity to light and sound. As an added bonus, it can be taken at any time during a migraine attack and will abort it, leaving you clear-headed and not doped up at all.

For more information, read about <a href="http://www.meds.com/conrad/aash/gutterman.html" target="_blank">Imitrex (sumatriptan)</a> here:
Quote:
As a selective 5-HT type 1 agonist, SUMA does not stimulate other 5-HT receptors which cause nausea, vomiting and diarrhea as seen with METH, E, and DHE. Also, SUMA relieves sensitivity to light, sound, and smell in addition to controlling the nausea and vomiting of migraine.
Imitrex is available as in self-injection units (faster relief), tablet, and nasal spray form. I start getting a migraine (from a sharp rise in barometric pressure) about once every two months, so I keep two Imitrex tablets with me at all times, just in case. Let me tell you, they changed my life; my migraines used to last three days and it was three days of unbelievable torment, where I couldn't work or do anything. Nothing short of knocking me out for a couple of days ever worked and, of course, I couldn't work that way, either. Imitrex is wonderful because it's not a narcotic; just makes you normal fast.
DRFseven is offline  
Old 05-21-2002, 03:12 PM   #96
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 376
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Bree:
<strong>

Hey - why don't you post to me publically instead of sending me emails?!</strong>
I'm not sure. Let me readjust my tin-foil hat, I think some pesky aliens are blocking my normal thought patterns, causing my strange behavior.
Someone7 is offline  
Old 05-21-2002, 03:20 PM   #97
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,369
Cool

Yes, and Chiro originally got into things like biomagnetism and energy points.

Physics originally held that the universe was filled with aether.

Chemistry originally only recognized four elements.

Republicans used to be the more progressive political party in the United States.

Psychiatrists used to perscribe cocaine.

Times change, knowledge increases. Get over it.
Corwin is offline  
Old 05-21-2002, 03:53 PM   #98
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
Post

Quote:
Times change, knowledge increases. Get over it.
And I think our knowledge has indeed increased in the two centuries since Hahneman came up with his brand of medicine.
Coragyps is offline  
Old 05-21-2002, 03:56 PM   #99
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,369
Cool

Our knowledge of anatomy has changed a lot since people started practicing surgery.... with about a 5% survival rate.

Should we brush that off too?

Our knowledge of biology has increased since Genesis and Leviticus... should we brush off zoology, botany, and microbiology?
Corwin is offline  
Old 05-21-2002, 04:15 PM   #100
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
Post

Corwin, I'll say it again:
Quote:
Sure, if homeopathy wishes to abandon its fundamental principles ("like cures like" and "the law of infinitesimals") and start using treatments that have a chance of working, fine. Of course, that would make them no different than conventional medicine, and they should be held to the same standards.
All standard homeopathic are diluted past the dilution limit (they list the dilution and it's a simple calculation), often ridiculously so. Even if that weren't the case, there is often virtually no evidence that the undiluted substance would have the effect claimed. As for chiropractic, it is still riddled with quackery and fraud, so don't act as if it's all in the past.

Oh, and are you going to admit that you were wrong about smallpox? The smallpox vaccine has never contained the smallpox virus.
tronvillain is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:19 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.