Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-18-2003, 02:37 PM | #201 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
|
|
03-18-2003, 02:39 PM | #202 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
|
|
03-18-2003, 02:40 PM | #203 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 957
|
Quote:
You assert: all uncaused events are eternal. I counter with examples of uncaused events which are not eternal. You say: but they can't be uncaused events because they are not eternal. Is it just me, or do I smell a "No true scotsman" fallacy? |
|
03-18-2003, 02:41 PM | #204 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
|
I personally feel that the notion of a "greatest possible being" is a bit silly. In fact, in my mind it's just as silly as the notion of the "greatest possible song." It's subjective. There is no absolute "greatest" when referring to a being just like there is no absolute "greatest" when referring to art.
Or another example: what about the greatest possible woman? Do you think any two men would agree on the description of who would fit that bill? One would want an atheletic red-head with a fiery temperment. Another might want a demure brunette with big...personalities. As an illustration of the subjective nature of things, how would you reconcile mercy with justice in a "greatest" possible being? Different people will have different opinions as to which mix is the best. Do you go the "eye for an eye" route? Do you go the "turn the other cheek" route? Which one is greatest? The two attributes are in subjective conflict with each other and yet you're looking for an objective absolute maximum. What about the fact that your GPB knows what will happen at every instant in time? How does a being with such knowledge apply justice? Does he allow the crime to be commited before punishing it or can he use his knowledge of what will happen to just punish crimes beforehand? Which is more just? One gives the person a chance to change (even though God already knows for a fact he won't) whereas the other prevents the crime from happening in the first place and thus protects innocent people from harm. A GPB is full of contradictions and will never satisfy any objective notion of "greatest." |
03-18-2003, 02:42 PM | #205 | ||||||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 378
|
Quote:
The definition can have an actual contradiction. Unless you are equating actual to exist- which in that case I agree. Anything that is defined as being logically contradictory cannot possibly exist. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
so now your opinion on these matters is relevant and mine is not? How cordial of you. Quote:
And if talking about God is so irrelevant, then why dont you just scoot along and post in another forum? I'm going to continue to post my opinions regarding this subject. And they are relevant. |
||||||
03-18-2003, 02:42 PM | #206 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
|
Quote:
|
|
03-18-2003, 02:43 PM | #207 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
|
|
03-18-2003, 02:45 PM | #208 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
03-18-2003, 02:45 PM | #209 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 957
|
Quote:
|
|
03-18-2003, 02:45 PM | #210 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|