FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-28-2002, 07:04 PM   #11
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 363
Post

virgio,

Since when is being non-confrontational immoral?

No one on this thread suggested befriending somebody for the sole purpose of deconverting them. Atheists are not missionaries. We’re not that devious.

The only thing Wyrdsmyth said was that if you want to change somebody’s mind, you can’t do it by making them defensive, you have to present your ideas in such a way that they’ll be considered. If that is behavior that would qualify as an “immoral atheist”, then I would call those standards of morality seriously warped.

Peace out.
Wizardry is offline  
Old 03-01-2002, 06:14 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Harrisburg, Pa
Posts: 3,251
Lightbulb

Technos

I'd leave them alone but when I do they give money to a chruch that uses that money to try to regulate my life.
Draygomb is offline  
Old 03-01-2002, 06:33 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Harrisburg, Pa
Posts: 3,251
Lightbulb

Sandy
Quote:
I asked her what authority she used to decide which bits were in her religion and which bits weren't.
That is a very good question and one that should be pushed.

But asking someone to define spirit unless you really have no idea what it means or they're using it in an unorthidox manner might just be nitpicking.

Basically its a fishing trip for contradictions. Keep asking "How they know this" and "Why is that True" until they contradict theirself. Then by pointing out the contradiction you will have planted the seed of doubt.
Draygomb is offline  
Old 03-01-2002, 08:53 AM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 86
Post

Virgio:
Quote:
Wyrdsmyth, that's probably one of the most disgusting suggestions I've seen posting. You're suggesting the specious tactic of 'soft conversion' - pretending to care about someone's thoughts, opinions and beliefs for the sole purpose of changing those thoughts, opinions and beliefs. The betrayal of trust and lack of basic human empathy only seems to support the 'immoral atheist' stereotype - do you really want to do that?
I'm imagining that my child doesn't want to go to sleep at night because he believes there is a monster under his bed. I can tell him over and over again that monsters don't exist but will that help?
On the other hand, if I am empathetic and engage him in dialogue, get him to explain the monster to me, tell me how it can be under the bed when I'm gone and not when I'm in the room, etc., he will most likely learn a lesson in critical thinking skills that many adults never learn.
If I pretend with him to shoo the monster away, I reinforce his beliefs in unreal things.
If I am, on the other hand, curious but skeptical, he learns on his own he was mistaken. It might not work the first night or the first month, but eventually he will learn.

Would I be "pretending to care about someone's thoughts, opinions and beliefs for the sole purpose of changing those thoughts, opinions and beliefs"? Absolutely. Are you going to try to tell me that is a "betrayal of trust and lack of basic human empathy?" As a caring parent, I disagree.

I guess it depends on your viewpoint. Is it just that you have to be right? Or is it that you care that there are people in the world who believe in monsters and want to help the situation?

Dianna.
Dianna is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:05 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.