FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2002, 05:22 PM   #181
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
Post

When does the <a href="http://dictionary.msn.com/find/entry.asp?search=compression" target="_blank">compression</a> of the earth's core stop?

It stops the earth's core no longer decreases in size.

Shut the hell up.

[ March 10, 2002: Message edited by: tronvillain ]</p>
tronvillain is offline  
Old 03-10-2002, 05:26 PM   #182
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,369
Cool

So just because we no longer SEE the results of that compression, that compression is no longer occurring? While there are some branches of quantum mechanics that MIGHT agree with you, at least partially.... they've never been conclusively proven. (And you accuse ME of psudeoscience?)
Corwin is offline  
Old 03-10-2002, 05:29 PM   #183
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Post

I would agree with that Mageth... possibly you could explain to the class exactly when compression of the earth's core stops?

"Compression is a force. It is an external stress applied to an object that presses together. If the force of the compression is greater than the outward force of the object, the volume of the object will be decreased. Gases are easily compressed while solids and liquids are less easily compressed if at all."

The answer is: "compression" continues; volume decrease ends when the "outward force" of the object being compressed equals the compression force. When volume decrease ends, temperature stops rising. The pressure's still there, but it's not generating a change in volume or increase in temperature.

Note that this doesn't help your case;
increasing pressure due to the sinking of dense materials may be adding thermal energy by decreasing the volume of the core (I'm not even sure if this is the case?); if the system is in or reaches a static state, pressure would stop increasing and temperature would stop rising, but the pressure would still be there. Just like the book on the desk doesn't cause the table to heat up.
Mageth is offline  
Old 03-10-2002, 05:32 PM   #184
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,369
Cool

Actually it does, although that may not be immediately obvious.

As long as there is compression there is energy being pumped into the system. Doesn't matter if the object being compressed is changing in size or not, the energy is still there.
Corwin is offline  
Old 03-10-2002, 05:37 PM   #185
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
Post

Corwin:
Quote:
As long as there is compression there is energy being pumped into the system. Doesn't matter if the object being compressed is changing in size or not, the energy is still there.
If the object is not changing in size, it is by definition not being compressed.
tronvillain is offline  
Old 03-10-2002, 05:38 PM   #186
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
Post

Corwin: You said it yourself - "as long as there is compression". You MUST have the ACTION of compression - macroscopic movement or microscopic rearrangement of crystal lattices (= a change in pressure) to get any heat.
Coragyps is offline  
Old 03-10-2002, 05:40 PM   #187
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Post

When does the compression of the earth's core stop? It doesn't

Run away! We're gonna be a black hole!

I'm definitely no expert and need to read a few books myself, but it seems to me that you either 1) don't know physics from psychics; or 2) are too proud to admit when you're wrong.

If you know physics and are not wrong, then you should be able to submit a simple equation for calculating heat generated in a table by the aforementioned book.
Mageth is offline  
Old 03-10-2002, 05:45 PM   #188
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
Post

Quote:
Corwin
Ergo, temperature increases, in the same way it does when you stamp a coin. (The surface is smooth because the compression increases the heat enough that the metal becomes liquid. When the pressure is removed, the heat dissipates and the metal solidifies.)
Nonsense!
To liquify metals you need to increase the temperature to thousands of degrees.
Metals can easily be shaped without increasing their temperature. For example consider the metal in the wires of your stereo. You can bend them any which way without increasing their temperature by simply applying force. Coins are made with the same principle.

Try answering my previous post, Corwin.

[ March 10, 2002: Message edited by: NOGO ]</p>
NOGO is offline  
Old 03-10-2002, 05:46 PM   #189
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,369
Post

<img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" />

Again, the compression is there WHETHER IT HAS ANY EFFECT OR NOT!!!!!!

And there is still energy being directed into the system. Compressing a solid with insufficent force to make it change in size any is still compressing it. In this compression there is still energy. The energy doesn't just 'go away' simply because the solid object won't compress anymore. That energy is still there. You want a formula? I'll look for one. At the same time why don't you look for a listing of the first self-replicating molecules that would eventually become life? I think you'll have about as much success. In that case we don't know precisely what they were. We DO know they existed.
Corwin is offline  
Old 03-10-2002, 05:48 PM   #190
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
Post

I think I may see the problem here: you are under the impression that for a force to exist a constant input of energy is required. This is simply not true, and that you think it is is probably a result of your intuitive ideas about physics. For a human to constantly push against a stationary wall requires energy, but this is an artifact of biology - replace the human with a compressed spring and no energy is required at all.
tronvillain is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:16 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.