FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Science & Skepticism > Science Discussions
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-27-2003, 08:02 PM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 235
Default Medical Arguments Against Homosexuality?

Sometimes I hear the claim that homosexual sex is medically unsafe in some sense - it produces muscle tissue damage to the anus, or some argument along those lines.

As a scientific ignoramus, I have no idea whether this argument is true, partly true, or entirely false. Is homosexual sex (and I guess I'm talking in particular about anal sex) harmful to one's health in the sense of damaging the ano-rectal area?
Groovy Cosmic Monkey is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 08:10 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Amerrka
Posts: 688
Default

Don't hurt me for talking so pervertedly, I usually don't; but I guess it all matters on the size....
EGGO is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 10:15 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: A soulless suburb of Chicago
Posts: 1,000
Default

I suppose it's possible due to the sensitivity of the tissue in that area. However, I can't say I've ever seen an article stating that any large group of people have come down with chronic health problems from having too much anal sex. Considering how much effort some people went to to pin AIDS on gays in the 80s, I would think someone would have been more vocal about the muscle damage thing if it was widely suspected.

Monkey, can you tell us where you saw this idea presented?
SiliconWolf is offline  
Old 08-27-2003, 10:25 PM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 235
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by SiliconWolf
Monkey, can you tell us where you saw this idea presented?
The usual religious anti-gay literature that floats around.
Groovy Cosmic Monkey is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 05:19 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 28
Default

Not to be picky, but to judge from reading Dan Savage's sex advice column, Savage Love, anal sex is hardly limited to homosexuals, at least in North America. He even sponsored a contest to "officially" name the act of anally penetrating one's heterosexual boyfriend with a dildo ("pegging").
Dale Merlin is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 05:55 AM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gilead
Posts: 11,186
Default Re: Medical Arguments Against Homosexuality?

Quote:
Originally posted by Groovy Cosmic Monkey
Sometimes I hear the claim that homosexual sex is medically unsafe in some sense - it produces muscle tissue damage to the anus, or some argument along those lines.

As a scientific ignoramus, I have no idea whether this argument is true, partly true, or entirely false. Is homosexual sex (and I guess I'm talking in particular about anal sex) harmful to one's health in the sense of damaging the ano-rectal area?
Well, it can tear tissue in the area, particularly if attempted without lubrication. These breaks in the tissue can then make one more susceptible to infection. But 1) this can also happen with vaginal sex; and 2) as has been mentioned, this type of sexual activity certainly isn't limited to homosexuals. So yes, it has the potential to be medically unsafe, as does essentially every other form of homo- or heterosexual activity.
Roland98 is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 06:36 AM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
Default

I think the question could be rephrased as "Are there medical problems associated with anal sex?" I'm actually quite curious about the answer.
Godless Dave is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 07:55 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: god's judge (pariah)
Posts: 1,281
Default

I've enjoyed it with quite a number of young women(not so much since marriage though) and never had a problem. I have had instances where there was vaginal tearing, but it was generally with girls who weren't quite as...well....used to it, would be a good word. Another would be, "too tight"...but that's crude.
keyser_soze is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 08:56 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
Default

Anal intercourse is associated with a much higher risk of infectious disease transmission, including hepatitis and AIDS, than either vaginal or oral sex, and is associated with an increased of fecal incontinence and anal carcinoma.
Dr Rick is offline  
Old 08-28-2003, 09:29 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
Default

One might propose that ALL human sexual behaviours are "hazardous"; jerking-off (in moderation) probably the least so.... Pregnancy & delivery (up to the last 25, 30 years or less) have always been hazardous in the extreme. Male OBs used to go from the anatomy lab to their female patients,; and, too proud to wash their hands, carried "puerperal fever" ( a killer) from bed to bed. Semelweiss went crazy trying to point this out; but nobody listened.
abe smith is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:00 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.