FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-25-2002, 04:44 AM   #21
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Winter Park, Fl USA
Posts: 411
Post

I was reading a book a about NDEs a few years back, and the book mentioned that a sizable number of children who have NDEs are reunited with deceased pets during their experience.

I know not all Christians take NDEs seriously as a legitimate "peek" into a supernatural afterlife realm; but for those who do, I wonder how they explain these reunions with deceased pets?
Echo is offline  
Old 06-25-2002, 05:43 AM   #22
Beloved Deceased
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Posts: 2,704
Post

This raises a problem, though; what about extremophiles that enjoy really hot weather? How would Hell torture them?

Easy, they are sent to Saskatoon.
MadMordigan is offline  
Old 06-25-2002, 06:45 AM   #23
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 116
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Martin Gibbs:
<strong>[sniffle][sniffle][sob]

of COURsE pets go to heaven...I mean, I they can't just DIE forever...I HAVE to see blackie again, I HAVE to, I HAVE to...it's not fair....

[sniffle]


"he used.....sarcasm"</strong>

And if they didn't, that stupid wench on Animal Planet who claims to be a "pet psychic" wouldn't have anything to talk to. Wouldn't that be sad?
RobertE is offline  
Old 06-25-2002, 07:17 AM   #24
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 207
Post

I've read that children too young to fully understand death who have NDEs often meet with family, friends and others they know who are still alive. This kind of supports that it's hallucinations.
Gringo is offline  
Old 06-26-2002, 02:12 AM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,206
Post

Bree,

I am very sorry to have caused you any offence. I had honestly not meant the term I used to be derrogatory in any way. Looking at m-w.com, I see it is marked down as being "often offensive", but I thought it was still used in the medical sense.

Ill try to think before I type next time!

TommyC
tommyc is offline  
Old 06-26-2002, 04:29 AM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,886
Post

tommyc:
I think using "retard" as a verb that means "reduce" would be ok, but calling someone "a retard" is not...
excreationist is offline  
Old 06-26-2002, 09:33 AM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Twin Cities, USA
Posts: 3,197
Post

Thanks, tommyc - and yep, excreationist hit it right on the head .
Bree is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:32 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.