Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Lobstrosity · 08-02-2003, 06:36 PM

I'm always here to help.

Shake · 08-04-2003, 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lobstrosity
I guess as a physicist the idea of a "sub-quarkic atom field" was just glaringly bogus.

Just make sure the output signal from your dilithium crystals go through your flux capacitor filter on their way to the space modulator!

[Doc]
One point twenty-one gigawatts?!?!?!
[/Doc]

Wounded King · 08-04-2003, 06:36 AM

Why not just reverse the polarities?

Tenpudo · 08-04-2003, 06:46 AM

Don't forget the FAQ!

Quote:

Who from scientific history would you like to meet?
What do you enjoy about your work?
What aspects of science would you change if you could?
What was your first scientific experiment?
What was your high-school science teacher like?
What is your proudest achievement?
What was your most embarrassing moment?

Lobstrosity · 08-04-2003, 12:51 PM

Hey, those are things inquiring minds really want to know!

Shake · 08-07-2003, 01:22 PM

Of course, it now occurs to me that your diphase quantizer may be out of calibration.

Hmmm... I think I'll get a drink from the replicator!
"Computer! Beer. Cold. Refreshing!"
*cold, refreshing beer materializes*
AHHHHHHHHHH!

ex-xian · 08-07-2003, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shake
Of course, it now occurs to me that your diphase quantizer may be out of calibration.

Hmmm... I think I'll get a drink from the replicator!
"Computer! Beer. Cold. Refreshing!"
*cold, refreshing beer materializes*
AHHHHHHHHHH!

I can't stand synthehol myself...of course if you realign the molecular digitizer and increase the amplitude of the antimatter magnetic bottles that hold the magic space genies...aww fahgetaboutit!

Claudia · 08-08-2003, 01:38 AM

For those who didn take the time to look at the poll's results:

Quote:

DNA Free Food Survey Results

The results of the previous DNA Free Food Survey are in. This is where we reveal the fact that the DNA Free Food Society was a joke. DNA free food is impossible - unless you confine your diet to certain foods such as sugar and vegetable oil.

Which is a shame because 19% of the 541 people who I surveyed on this site said they would pay 10 fold more for DNA free food.

38% said they would pay and additional 50% or more for DNA free food.

42% said they would pay nothing more for DNA free food.

Mistress of Tales · 08-08-2003, 07:09 AM

I, for one, would pay 1000% more for non-DNA food. DNA is bad for your health, makes you fat, and 99% of the xians who have tried it prefer to chew on their Bibles. :boohoo:

OpheliaC · 08-08-2003, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mistress of Tales
I, for one, would pay 1000% more for non-DNA food. DNA is bad for your health, makes you fat, and 99% of the xians who have tried it prefer to chew on their Bibles. :boohoo:

What? What DNA have you tried? Perhaps your parent's?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

08-02-2003, 06:36 PM	#11
Lobstrosity Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: San Diego, California Posts: 719	I'm always here to help.

08-04-2003, 06:36 AM	#13
Wounded King Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Edinburgh Posts: 1,211	Why not just reverse the polarities?

08-04-2003, 12:51 PM	#15
Lobstrosity Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: San Diego, California Posts: 719	Hey, those are things inquiring minds really want to know!

08-07-2003, 01:22 PM	#16
Shake Contributor Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY Posts: 14,394	Of course, it now occurs to me that your diphase quantizer may be out of calibration. Hmmm... I think I'll get a drink from the replicator! "Computer! Beer. Cold. Refreshing!" cold, refreshing beer materializes AHHHHHHHHHH!

08-08-2003, 07:09 AM	#19
Mistress of Tales Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Norway Posts: 7	I, for one, would pay 1000% more for non-DNA food. DNA is bad for your health, makes you fat, and 99% of the xians who have tried it prefer to chew on their Bibles. :boohoo:

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.