FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-07-2003, 11:21 AM   #51
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: the gulag
Posts: 3,043
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Jimmy Higgins
I personally don't like that argument.
I don't particularly either, it's just that Americans are so hung up on how 9-11 was such a huge tragedy (which it was, don't get me wrong) but overall seem to care little when the same number of losses, and perhaps worse, are inflicted in a foreign country by our hands.
Jacey is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 11:32 AM   #52
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Proud Citizen of Freedonia
Posts: 42,473
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jman0904
Funny how a cluster bomb doesn't look like your average bomb. Good thing those little kids know what one looks like!
(Oh wait....damn, they don't. )
Then you have Iraqis using nuclear canisters to store food in, bath in, etc... I mean, didn't Iraq do testing on the mentally retarded in the 50's to learn the dangers of that?

I completely agree as far as this administration claims for accuracy and fewer civilian casualties. And in honesty, the percentage of deaths versus the pounds of bombs dropped is probably astonishly low. However, that very low percentage in no way means that children and innocents were slaughtered. To be honest, their deaths would be worthy if this whole thing was about freedom, alas, that isn't the case.
Jimmy Higgins is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 11:36 AM   #53
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Proud Citizen of Freedonia
Posts: 42,473
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Godless Dave
This is just me, but if I were planning to invade a country and remove its leadership, I would come up with a rebuilding plan before the invasion. But again, that's just me.
That is usually the best idea, but right now we have a president who has said he doesn't ~"think much into why he does stuff." This is a perfect example of it.

On the other hand, even the best laid out plan previously still would needed to of been very flexible depending on Iraqi moods. But let us remember this, the American Revolution started in New England, when harvests were poor and the winters were cold. It is unbearably hot right now, and no comfort is to be seen from temperatures for months. This is not a good recipe for success on the wing. I'm worried about things getting much worse. Iran helped cost Carter the election in 1980. Could Iraq be the same fate for Bush?
Jimmy Higgins is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 12:18 PM   #54
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: burbank
Posts: 758
Default

jacey, bush's "protection" does not change the fact that he is still a marked man. he may be for the rest of his life. secret service protection is nice and all, but he has laid it out on the line as the main reprsentative of our country. this is not to minimize the loss of any individual, but rather to point out the unique position bush is in as our leader. and to counter the mistaken belief here that bush, the man, is not in any danger. i'm sure his africa trip will be a tense one.

and thanks for the restraint.
fatherphil is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 12:40 PM   #55
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: the gulag
Posts: 3,043
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fatherphil
jacey, bush's "protection" does not change the fact that he is still a marked man. he may be for the rest of his life. secret service protection is nice and all, but he has laid it out on the line as the main reprsentative of our country. this is not to minimize the loss of any individual, but rather to point out the unique position bush is in as our leader. and to counter the mistaken belief here that bush, the man, is not in any danger. i'm sure his africa trip will be a tense one.

and thanks for the restraint.
I can't believe you actually typed this. Of course he is a marked man, he's in the office of POTUS.

And what does any of this have to do with his cowboy "bring them on" comments, which no one forced him to make. The shallowness demonstrated by this entire administration is just awful. Can you imagine what it's like to hear this shit if you're one of the Marines eating MRE's three times a day worried about getting shot at by the people who were supposedly going to welcome us?

So much spinning I'm dizzy
Jacey is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 12:49 PM   #56
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Oregon, the new Least Religious State in America
Posts: 453
Default

And some people wondered why the Fox tried to kill Hitler.
Go figure.

*Hunkers down as to avoid low-flying flames*
jman0904 is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 01:04 PM   #57
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: burbank
Posts: 758
Default

then tell me jacey, what do the marines have to say to those forces who intend to continue to conduct a guerilla war against in order to wear down the resolve of the american population to see iraq transition into a stable democratic government?
fatherphil is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 01:17 PM   #58
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 638
Default

Unbelievable.

Quote:
Franks said he agreed with the president's controversial message last week for Iraqi militants attacking U.S. troops.

"Absolutely," said Franks, adding: "Bring 'em on."

Franks said several hundred U.S. and other foreign forces had lost their lives in Afghanistan and Iraq over the past 22 months and this toll should be looked at in the light of about 3,000 Americans who died in the September 11, 2001 attacks.

"The fact is, wherever we find criminals, death squads and so forth who are anxious to do damage to this country and to peace-loving countries around the world, I absolutely agree with the president of the United States: 'bring 'em on."
link
How long and for how many issues will they continue to use the victims of 9/11 to try to excuse everything they do, including their mistakes?
Danya is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 01:20 PM   #59
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: the gulag
Posts: 3,043
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fatherphil
then tell me jacey, what do the marines have to say to those forces who intend to continue to conduct a guerilla war against in order to wear down the resolve of the american population to see iraq transition into a stable democratic government?
They want to know when the fuck Bush is going to let them go home. Their spouses and kids ask the same thing.

I read several articles last week with each sentiment, I'll try to find and link some.
Jacey is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 01:22 PM   #60
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Proud Citizen of Freedonia
Posts: 42,473
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fatherphil
then tell me jacey, what do the marines have to say to those forces who intend to continue to conduct a guerilla war against in order to wear down the resolve of the american population to see iraq transition into a stable democratic government?
I'd tell the marines that we, the government, were sorry that we didn't place you into a situation where we had a second clue about. That we didn't know that Iraq would put up such a fight in the first place and then virtually rip apart their own country afterward. We are sorry that our plans for a new government is taking so long and that every attempt at fixing the infrastructure is messed up because we didn't come in the right way. Sorry your lives are at risk because Bush has no idea what is going on. Kinda like in Lebanon with Reagan!
Jimmy Higgins is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:46 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.