Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-14-2002, 07:56 AM | #21 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
|
Look's like we have another contestant from Cobb County. This one is a chiropractor.
Quote:
|
|
10-14-2002, 10:38 AM | #22 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Heaven
Posts: 6,980
|
Arrogance: 8
Ignorance: 9 Writing Inability: 3 |
10-15-2002, 02:22 AM | #23 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
From an area paper:
Quote:
|
|
10-15-2002, 05:55 AM | #24 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Heaven
Posts: 6,980
|
Arrogance: Only about 6--not too bad.
Ignorance: 11. Second law of thermodynamics for fuck's sake! Writing inability: 6. Eh, I've seen much, much, much worse. |
10-19-2002, 01:00 AM | #25 |
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4
|
posted on ChristianForums by f.Christian
Originally the word liberal meant social conservatives(no govt religion--none) who advocated growth and progress---mostly technological(knowledge being absolute/unchanging)based on law--reality... UNDER GOD---the nature of GOD/man/govt. does not change. These were the Classical liberals...founding fathers-PRINCIPLES---stable/SANE scientific reality/society---industrial progress...moral/social character-values(private/personal) GROWTH! Evolution...Atheism-dehumanism---TYRANNY... Then came the post-modern age of switch-flip-spin-DEFORMITY-cancer...Atheist secular materialists through ATHEISM/evolution CHANGED-REMOVED the foundations...demolished the wall(separation of state/religion)--trampled the TRUTH-GOD...built a satanic temple/SWAMP-MALARIA/RELIGION(cult of darwin-marx-satan) over them---made these absolutes subordinate--relative and calling/CHANGING all the... residuals---technology/science === TO evolution via sclock science...to substantiate/justify their efforts--claims...social engineering--PC--atheism...anti-God/Truth RELIGION--and declared a crusade/WAR--JIHAD--INTOLERANCE/TYRANNY...against God--man--society/SCIENCE!! What's this guy's score? I am having trouble finding any sentence structure whatsoever. |
10-19-2002, 02:57 AM | #26 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I first met f.Christian a few months ago over at Free Republic on one of their creation/evolution threads. I initially thought that he was a troll trying to make the creationists look even dumber than they already are, but I soon realized that he was a real creationist with some SERIOUS mental problems. He's posted his jibberish on literally hundreds of threads but still hasn't been banned (I think the freepers feel sorry for him).
Take a look at his freeper <a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/profile?u=35711" target="_blank">profile page.</a> His rantings on the right side of the page (scroll down) are really bizarre. The scary thing is that he claims to have a son! Here's another of his posts about evolution: Quote:
<img src="confused.gif" border="0"> [ October 19, 2002: Message edited by: atheist_in_foxhole ]</p> |
|
10-19-2002, 05:43 AM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 762
|
Quote:
|
|
10-19-2002, 11:24 AM | #28 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Posts: 80
|
here's one for you guys. These are excerpts from a letter received by Dr. Saladin. I don't suppose he'd mind if it were shared here:
Quote:
|
|
10-19-2002, 01:49 PM | #29 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 433
|
Quote:
Incomprehensibility: 9.0 --- If you try really hard, you can detect some kind of meaning in this. Writing inability: --- Amazing...he got most of the words right! Arrogance: 7.0 --- This person claims that evolution destroyed moral foundations and Jefferson's Wall; this isn't an entirely unreasonable state of opinion, actually, though I don't endorse it (momentous findings of science can, without question, be badly abused, but it is people who do this. No scientific principle is inherently good or evil). I find it highly offensive, though, that he calls evolution a blasphemy of science and claims, further to his discredit, that the claims are fraudulant and biased (the "work of Satan" routine, and all that rubbish). Ignorance: 8.0 --- I base this mostly on his lack of sentence structure and his claim that a scientific principle can cause social harm (again, it is people who do evil. Science is but a tool). He gets one extra point for his claim that evolutionary science is based in ideology; nothing could be further from the truth, for reasons I needn't mention. |
|
10-19-2002, 02:38 PM | #30 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|